We assumes that, like all true worm drowners, you held out your arms and explained that the 'giant rats' that got away were 'this big'...
Re: Non-native species
Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 9:16 pm
by TRG-22
snayperskaya wrote:
TRG-22 wrote:What's madness is to think that it is right and proper for us to exterminate any other living creatures for our own convenience.
Actually, it's not just madness, it is morally disgusting.
Tell that to American farmers about feral hogs or Australian farmers about rabbits..........
I'm not suggesting it's either simple or easy.
Nor that lethal measures should never be used.
But I do object to unthinking defaults of lethal measures as first resorts.
Re: Non-native species
Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 9:54 pm
by meles meles
Jeremy could invite 'em round for tea and biscuits ...
Re: Non-native species
Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 10:37 pm
by snayperskaya
TRG-22 wrote:
snayperskaya wrote:
TRG-22 wrote:What's madness is to think that it is right and proper for us to exterminate any other living creatures for our own convenience.
Actually, it's not just madness, it is morally disgusting.
Tell that to American farmers about feral hogs or Australian farmers about rabbits..........
I'm not suggesting it's either simple or easy.
Nor that lethal measures should never be used.
But I do object to unthinking defaults of lethal measures as first resorts.
So what would be your first resort for one of these things?And they get bigger than this!........
I was talking to someone at my club the other month that culled one in the Forest of Dean here in the UK that was 11ft long from snout to tail.
Re: Non-native species
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 5:56 pm
by TRG-22
I'm not going to pretend that there's a simple or easy answer, or any which aren't problematic in some way. I'm not pretending that I am an expert.
Nor am I going to suggest that no culling should ever be done - far from it, in fact, as I know it is to some extent necessary, often because of our previous meddling (Scottish deer face no natural predators which would normally take out the weak ones because we've exterminated them).
There can aso be revenue opportunities from hunting permits and facilities, and the sale of the meat - that boar, for example would furnish a great many barbeques. Although I believe that some people find the taste of the meat from uncastrated males as "tainted", but as a man who's happily eaten road-kill pheasant I'm probably not well placed to comment on that.
As I've said before, I have no problem with the killing of animals, I regularly eat bits of dead ones, and I have no problem with people taking pride in their stalking and marksmanship skills.
But I do object to the "shoot first, think about other ways later" philosophy, I don't think man has the moral right to kill any other creatures that he wants to for convenience, without looking for other ways. And all those who oppose rewilding as a way to try and restore some of the balance we have destroyed are basically saying that the ideal situation is where we have driven some species into extinction in particular areas.
Ever since the first stone age man cut down a tree or trapped or killed an animal we've been modifying our environment. Ever since we started domesticating wolves and aurochs and cross-breeding we've been engaged in genetic modification.
But we are, or should be, careful and resepectful stewards of the planet, not its jack-booted masters trying to bludgeon it into submission.
Re: Non-native species
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 6:06 pm
by TRG-22
jack Mack wrote:I live 150 yards away from the Tay and yesterday went for my lockdown exercise. I couldn't believe the damage being caused by beavers both from borrowing into the banks and felling trees.
What do you say to those who point out that beavers do a lot of good in managing water flows and reducing flooding?
Also invasive species
No, they used to be native.
We made them extinct.
Now we have positive comments on the release of wolves and lynx in Scotland.
So you think we should drive species into extinction?
Do you think that what was done to the passenger pigeon should be held up as shining example of man's interaction with the natural world?
Madness.
No.
Respectful, moral, co-operative sharing of the planet, not totalitarianism.
Re: Non-native species
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 7:00 pm
by Pete
Snaperskaya, that looks like an estate agents photo to me..........and 11 feet long, really??
Pete
Re: Non-native species
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 10:01 pm
by snayperskaya
Pete wrote:Snaperskaya, that looks like an estate agents photo to me..........and 11 feet long, really??
Pete
I'll hold my hand up and say that looking at it logically I may have misheard the 11ft bit, but either way these things can get pretty bloody big.
Re: Non-native species
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 10:22 pm
by TRG-22
Pete wrote:Snaperskaya, that looks like an estate agents photo to me..........and 11 feet long, really??
Pete
Re: Non-native species
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 10:29 pm
by TRG-22
snayperskaya wrote:I'll hold my hand up and say that looking at it logically I may have misheard the 11ft bit, but either way these things can get pretty bloody big.