.243 - is it actually any good ?

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
User avatar
kennyc
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:21 pm
Home club or Range: hunters NRPC
Location: Reading West Berks
Contact:

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#21 Post by kennyc »

Browning_grrl wrote:I had to look up Roe deer - never seen one - how much meat can ya get off one? I should think the dressed weight is pretty small. Is it worth the bullet? It sure isn't gonna fill your freezer.
look up Muntjac, now they are small! however unlike the US we don't have a limit on how many Deer we can shoot, and the seasons are such that there is always something in season (poor old Munties) and at $1 or so a shot its definitely worth the bullet :D
Browning_grrl

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#22 Post by Browning_grrl »

Interesting game - strange animals - the shot itself , I imagine, would have to be a head shot, like coyote (so as you don't ruin the pelt), otherwise you won't have much left to eat....... .223 - 55 gr??
User avatar
ovenpaa
Posts: 24689
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#23 Post by ovenpaa »

Muntjac is superb eating and my absolute favourite food for Christmas day.
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
GazMorris

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#24 Post by GazMorris »

Browning_grrl wrote:Interesting game - strange animals - the shot itself , I imagine, would have to be a head shot, like coyote (so as you don't ruin the pelt), otherwise you won't have much left to eat....... .223 - 55 gr??
My Pa has shot a decent number of muntjac in the UK with his 223 but also with a very lightly loaded Hornady 160 grn roundnose shot out of a 6.5/06. Neck shots for preference, but a heart and lung shot will still leave plenty of meat.

We don't have muntjac here in NZ, but I use a 260 Rem, which seems to work very nicely on most things.

Coming back to the original question; 243 is a nice, versatile round if you've got the barrel twist to handle the heavier 100+ grain bullets. It is a bit of a barrel burner, but if you're only using it for hunting this shouldn't be a major issue.

Gaz
User avatar
meles meles
Posts: 6335
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#25 Post by meles meles »

Hmmm, we don't like the sound of 'barrel burner'
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
User avatar
phaedra1106
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Just outside Sacriston (the nice bit!)
Contact:

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#26 Post by phaedra1106 »

Just buy a Tikka T3 in .260 Rem or .308, there's really not much you can't do with either of them :good:
There's room for all Gods creatures, next to the mash and gravy :)
User avatar
kennyc
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:21 pm
Home club or Range: hunters NRPC
Location: Reading West Berks
Contact:

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#27 Post by kennyc »

Browning_grrl wrote:Interesting game - strange animals - the shot itself , I imagine, would have to be a head shot, like coyote (so as you don't ruin the pelt), otherwise you won't have much left to eat....... .223 - 55 gr??
.308 150Grn soft point works for me :D never had to worry about meat damage.the coat to be honest tends to go to waste anyway as I personally don't tan them.also even more than most deer, they rarely stop moving for long and the head is a small target at 100 yards when its bobbing around.
my personal favourite to eat is Sika, but Muntjac is a good second.
User avatar
DL.
Posts: 1634
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:24 am
Contact:

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#28 Post by DL. »

.243 for deer. It has it's place, for those that know what they're doing and need what it offers - fast fragmenting bullets in light weights.

Better to play it safe, and have more than you need. Better to be overgunned, you can't get too dead etc. etc.

Go for 6.5 minimum, maybe even 7mm for a capable allrounder, as I told you on another thread.

Much more important is the correct bullet construction for the quarry species and the type of shot you are wishing to achieve.

If you are trying to chest shoot a woodland stag during the rut, then you may want a different bullet to someone neck shooting roe.

High for weight 6.5 x 55 bullets are intended for large quarry for example Elk and Boar, try shooting a roe the size of a labrador and you might find the lack of expansion causes you problems. Reputations are hard won and quickly lost, if you have injured deer running around the place, chances are neighbouring landowners/stalkers will soon get to know who farked up.

I know some people swear by a-max for deer, but that my stripey friend is another matter entirely! ;)
User avatar
jcampbellsmith
Posts: 441
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:20 pm
Home club or Range: BDS, L&BRC
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#29 Post by jcampbellsmith »

I've lost count, but I think I've owned at least 3 x 243 Win and one 243 Ackley. I don't own any at the minute, but I do have a couple of 260 Rems for pursuing deer. Even with the 260 Rem, some care is required when pursuing sika. I suspect in years to come I will pursue sika with a .308 Win.

I also remember being told to leave the 243 Win in the car.

Regards

JCS
User avatar
DaveB
Posts: 1594
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:11 am
Home club or Range: Wellington Service Rifle Assocaition; NZ Deerstalkers Association; Wairarapa Pistol & Shooting Sports Club
Location: Upper Hutt, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#30 Post by DaveB »

Sometimes ammunition availability factors in the decision as well. Here, if you go to the local gun shop you can find 17 choices of brand and bullet weights in .243, while in 6.5 you have 8 to choose from. Generally speaking - .243 is easier to come by than 6.5mm.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests