Page 3 of 3
Re: Double standard's
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:27 am
by dromia
karen wrote:Robin128 wrote:I think Dromia clarifies things..."For me the fundamental difference is that these organisations have chosen to occupy these boards and have a presence here, on an open forum that invites peoples views and opinions.
:)
Um I was invited - I didn't choose to come here.
Love
karen
OK, but you and your colleagues have chosen to accept the invitation and stay here, and as I have said before I welcome, thank and respect you and your colleagues for that.
Re: Double standard's
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:31 pm
by karen
dromia wrote:
OK, but you and your colleagues have chosen to accept the invitation and stay here, and as I have said before I welcome, thank and respect you and your colleagues for that.
I think I have to make it clear that nothing I (or my colleagues) say is an official view from the NRA. I think we would need Glynn Alger or Robin Pizer for anything official.
We can pass on news and put our own points of view across but I really don't think our presence here can be described as "these organisations have chosen to occupy these boards".
Love
karen
Re: Double standard's
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:53 pm
by dodgyrog
Either of those worthies would be brave indeed to post on this forum - they would get a severe mauling!
Re: Double standard's
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:03 pm
by Robin128
dodgyrog wrote:Either of those worthies would be brave indeed to post on this forum - they would get a severe mauling!
Steady on Dodgyrog!