Re: Leeds 'Cache' found
Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 4:50 pm
Were any elves harmed? Their safety must be paramount !
All people seeking membership must contact admin after registering to be validated.
https://www.full-bore.co.uk/
Over here if reported, my local police would have replied "So? It is old wet ammo, toss it in the bin"Despite the thousands of bullets that were found, the police did not feel the need to evacuate the couple
Goodness me Gaz, haven't seen such anti-police rhetoric of this magnitude, from you in a while...Gaz wrote: These stories of "GIANT CACHE OF DEATH NEUTRALISED BY BRAVE COPS" are invariably based on police press releases made available to local and national reporters alike. Some of those pictures are obviously taken with a phone camera by the family themselves, while the pictures of the dud ammo has all the hallmarks of police PR - gloved hands (intended to make the reader think "ah, forensics, they'll catch the buggers!) and zoomed out far enough to make actual details difficult to pick out.
This type of thing usually makes it as a page lead on a local paper because it's relatively rare, and because neither reporter nor editor nor (the vast majority of) readers actually understand that the greatest danger from hauls like this is more likely to be lead poisoning rather than any ability to explode or be fired.
Police like to plug these things heavily to try and win brownie points for their "public confidence" agenda. With a bit of nouse you can see most of what they recover tends to be either stolen tacticool .22s or rusty old pistols that haven't seen any maintenance since May 1945.
The logical conclusion of this police PR strategy is the shocking and disgraceful raid on Mick Shepherd, which was done hand-in-glove with the press (who enjoy being invited along to see a few doors kicked in, heads banged together and some hardware to play with - as would anyone here, I suspect) purely for PR purposes. As we all know well, Mick was as innocent as a newborn lamb and the police fishing expedition failed to turn up anything.
I would put money on the couple in this story being interviewed either after a briefing from the police PR, to "suggest" things to mention to the reporter, or with the PR handlers actually present to prompt them to say how terrified they were when they found the corroded old brass (clue - not so terrified as to pick it up, walk off with it and show it to their mates!) and how glad they were to see brave PC Plod turning up to save them from CERTAIN DEATH or some such rubbish.
As a local news editor I always avoided running these PR pieces unless I could tell for myself that they'd found something worthwhile. That happened rarely.
That's exactly what I thought - Does the cat have a grudge?Burner wrote:What pray tell could a cat have done with it?
"Good morning. Tell me, will you admit to briefing members of the public before they were interviewed by the press?"Sim G wrote:Goodness me Gaz, haven't seen such anti-police rhetoric of this magnitude, from you in a while...
Go on, give them a bell. Ask if they did as you suggest....
Press Office hours
Monday - Friday: 07:15am – 5:15pm
Saturday - Sunday: 9am - 4pm (and Bank Holidays)
Contact Telephone: 01245 452450.
House cats are always getting hold of live ammo, in the papers all the time. Especially those Siamese cats, can't trust a Siamese cat with ammo.Dougan wrote:That's exactly what I thought - Does the cat have a grudge?Burner wrote:What pray tell could a cat have done with it?
Gaz wrote:"Good morning. Tell me, will you admit to briefing members of the public before they were interviewed by the press?"
"No comment"
... :roll:
Just imagining the likely response to an enquiry about openness and transparency in the police, old bean.Sim G wrote:Gaz wrote:"Good morning. Tell me, will you admit to briefing members of the public before they were interviewed by the press?"
"No comment"
... :roll:
Now, now Gaz, judging from the time of your post, you didn't call them. So is the conversation an assumption or "British reporting standard Number 1"....?