So a 'blank stare' and a shrug of the shoulders when the FEO pops round and asks why you want a 2+1 is good enough?phaedra1106 wrote:Not really, not the same way as you do with an FAC. With an SGC if the police can't give a reason why you shouldn't be granted one then you have the right to be granted one.
Usual Accurate BBC reporting.
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Re: Usual Accurate BBC reporting.
Re: Usual Accurate BBC reporting.
SevenSixTwo wrote:So a 'blank stare' and a shrug of the shoulders when the FEO pops round and asks why you want a 2+1 is good enough?phaedra1106 wrote:Not really, not the same way as you do with an FAC. With an SGC if the police can't give a reason why you shouldn't be granted one then you have the right to be granted one.
Technically, yes. The FEO may recommend against the guy from getting an FAC, but unless they can prove there's strong evidence that a cert shouldn't be granted, they'll get one!
Re: Usual Accurate BBC reporting.
And here's the same story with a different twist.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tees-21658828
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tees-21658828
Re: Usual Accurate BBC reporting.
My personal view is that a conviction, which would include cautions, for any form of violence or dishonesty should be an automatic bar for life for the grant of a SGC or FAC.
Ceri
Ceri
Re: Usual Accurate BBC reporting.
That would rule me out then. How many blokes get involved in a punch-up in their teens?... probably a bit unfair to penalise them for something that happened 20-odd years ago (and who have lead exemplarary, 'upstanding' lives ever since (in the service of their country I might add)). I'm glad FEOs don't think like you.
-
- Posts: 1424
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:43 pm
- Home club or Range: NRA Bisley
- Location: Bisley
- Contact:
Re: Usual Accurate BBC reporting.
Not so much the FEOs (though they are mostly decent people trying to protect the public without trampling over us to excess - it's just where you decide to put the boundaries of discretion), more the lawmakers. The FEO in this case seems to have asked a very sensible question. I wonder what level of support he got from senior officers and the police lawyers in answering it? (the police do employ lawyers to assist their front line, yes?)SevenSixTwo wrote:That would rule me out then. How many blokes get involved in a punch-up in their teens?... probably a bit unfair to penalise them for something that happened 20-odd years ago (and who have lead exemplarary, 'upstanding' lives ever since (in the service of their country I might add)). I'm glad FEOs don't think like you.
- meles meles
- Posts: 6335
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
- Home club or Range: HBSA
- Location: Underground
- Contact:
Re: Usual Accurate BBC reporting.
We would hope so ! We used to get very regular briefings from a Captain in the Army Legal Service on the RoE afore goin' out on patrol in Mesopotamia and Ganniland...IainWR wrote:(the police do employ lawyers to assist their front line, yes?)
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun
Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun
Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Re: Usual Accurate BBC reporting.
I wonder why his guns were returned in 2008 after being taken away.
- meles meles
- Posts: 6335
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
- Home club or Range: HBSA
- Location: Underground
- Contact:
Re: Usual Accurate BBC reporting.
Maybe they were homing guns?
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun
Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun
Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests