Page 18 of 20
Re: Law Commission recommends total overhaul of firearms law
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 3:30 pm
by jmc67
Oh, and a 50g golf ball driven at 160km/h works out at about 50J of energy (assuming my maths is about right). So - ban all golf equipment, as it's obviously 50x over the safe limit of projectile sports???
Re: Law Commission recommends total overhaul of firearms law
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 6:41 pm
by Sim G
Sixshot6 wrote: I might have some if you are ok with me suggesting something.
Why not write your own?
Re: Law Commission recommends total overhaul of firearms law
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 6:46 pm
by dromia
Plagiarism rules ya bass!
Re: Law Commission recommends total overhaul of firearms law
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 6:47 pm
by Sim G
IsleShoot wrote:
On the subject of 'lethality' and the proposed 1 joule threshold, it may be of interest to note that an adult, throwing a cricket ball can impart an average of 147 joules into the projectile and that same adult swinging a claw hammer at a conservative 10m/s will create a force of over 200 joules.
"Lethal" is yet to be defined in legislation, but has been determined by the courts that the "weapon' must be capable of causing an injury from which death may result. It does include weapons that are not designed to kill but may do if misused, such as flare pistol. (Police National Legal Database, Consultant Editor Fraser Sampson)
Re: Law Commission recommends total overhaul of firearms law
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 6:47 pm
by Sim G
dromia wrote:Plagiarism rules ya bass!

Re: Law Commission recommends total overhaul of firearms law
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 6:49 pm
by Sixshot6
Sim G wrote:Sixshot6 wrote: I might have some if you are ok with me suggesting something.
Why not write your own?
I've had conflicting advice on whether I should or not. I'm sure I don't want to spam the whole thing but I don't know what to write either. What are you writing about Sim? I just need some advice and a starting point. I definitely want to point out that an increase in how long an FAC should last occur. 7-10 years instead of 5 (New Zealand does it so it can be done). Why pump action centerfires should be removed from section 5 and put back into section 1. Those are my first few. Is it a good start?
Re: Law Commission recommends total overhaul of firearms law
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 7:03 pm
by Gaz
Sixshot6 wrote:Sim G wrote:Sixshot6 wrote: I might have some if you are ok with me suggesting something.
Why not write your own?
I've had conflicting advice on whether I should or not. I'm sure I don't want to spam the whole thing but I don't know what to write either. What are you writing about Sim? I just need some advice and a starting point. I definitely want to point out that an increase in how long an FAC should last occur. 7-10 years instead of 5 (New Zealand does it so it can be done). Why pump action centerfires should be removed from section 5 and put back into section 1. Those are my first few. Is it a good start?
Try answering the questions they're asking. I've listed them here:
https://ukshootingnews.wordpress.com/20 ... s-in-full/
Re: Law Commission recommends total overhaul of firearms law
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 7:17 pm
by Sixshot6
Makes sense, What should I use to back certain things up? Have you any recommended links I should use for data that is relevant?
Re: Law Commission recommends total overhaul of firearms law
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 7:55 pm
by meles meles
Hmm, what about a Vauxhall Corsa approachin' at 47 mph and deliverin' a mighty swipe to the cranium ?
Re: Law Commission recommends total overhaul of firearms law
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 8:08 pm
by Sixshot6
meles meles wrote:Hmm, what about a Vauxhall Corsa approachin' at 47 mph and deliverin' a mighty swipe to the cranium ?
Or a car transporter. That's even more ouch in my book.