FAC Variation, slightly strange result?

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
John25

Re: FAC Variation, slightly strange result?

#11 Post by John25 »

We went through a phase at Bisley where, if your FAC said .308 we couldn't sell you 7.62 and vice versa.

Surrey FEO was eventually persuaded.

I believe that now, most areas accept one for the other, and so I believe, does the Home Office.

We won't go into the argument here about the minor techicalities of the differences.

Will we?

:twisted:
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7845
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: FAC Variation, slightly strange result?

#12 Post by Blackstuff »

Yes Durham did the same with me (5.55x45mm/.223Rem and 7.62x51mm/.308Win), strangely though when i had my .357 LBR i had to put my ticket back in to get it changed to .38/.357??

So do you have two separate ammo allowances listed then?? i.e. .308Win 400/500 and 7.62x51mm 200/300?
DVC
User avatar
Dr. Strangelove
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:46 pm
Location: North Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: FAC Variation, slightly strange result?

#13 Post by Dr. Strangelove »

Blackstuff wrote:So do you have two separate ammo allowances listed then?? i.e. .308Win 400/500 and 7.62x51mm 200/300?
I do, yes. Quite handy as it has basically doubled my ammunition allowance! Off the top of my head I can't remember exactly what I'm allowed but it's quite a bit more than I originally asked for!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests