Have they broke me?
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
- dromia
- Site Admin
- Posts: 20226
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
- Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
- Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
- Contact:
Re: Have they broke me?
Didn't he also advocate holding the rifle with a vice like, white knuckle grip?
It seemed to work well for him.
It seemed to work well for him.
Come on Bambi get some
Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad
Fecking stones
Real farmers don't need subsidies
Cow's farts matter!
For fine firearms and requisites visit
http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
Re: Have they broke me?
I would go with rifleman on this.....practice and more practice....for high recoil guns the normal grip is thought better, especially on a shotgun...
Political Correctness is the language of lies, written by the corrupt , spoken by the inept!
Re: Have they broke me?
I think that's more down to the ideas of the day, rather than what suited the particular rifle. That said, there are those who totally ignore the ideas of today and achieve brilliance.Watcher wrote:its instructive to see the angle he suggests.
..
Re: Have they broke me?
Find a method that works for you and stick to it....works for me.
Political Correctness is the language of lies, written by the corrupt , spoken by the inept!
Re: Have they broke me?
That is quite an angle and very much different to how I'd normally shoot prone, interesting thanks.
Re: Have they broke me?
Yes; looks bloody painful but in those days, if it didn't hurt, it was probably wrong!dromia wrote:Didn't he also advocate holding the rifle with a vice like, white knuckle grip?
It seemed to work well for him.
Re: Have they broke me?
I believe that the primary idea of the pistol grip, as well as the thumbhole and the deep cut of later Anschutz style wooden stocks, is so that the direction of trigger pull is as close as possible to parallel with the bore-line, to minimise forces that may contribute to moving the rifle off the natural point of aim. It also helps to promote a more natural/relaxed and straight wrist of the trigger hand when in position.Michael Sproul wrote:What are people's thoughts on pistol Vs standard, I imagine for running about a pistol grip would be advantages but there's no real accuracy benefit one way or the other once accustomed for general shooting on the range?
I grew up with the Anschutz style stock on the .22's of my boyhood days, used the same style on my early TR rifles (suffering the stock breakages that went with them before Thumbholes were permitted in competition) and now use one stock with a pistol grip for .22, 300m and TR (and MR, if I ever get around to it).
..
Re: Have they broke me?
Mike, there's a lot of good rifles out there, so you'll find a solution - here's one of my favourite's a .22Lr Finnfire.Michael Sproul wrote:It's a strange feeling for sure, I think it's my wrist position more than anything that feels weird.
Watcher, I think you may be right about body position. My standing seems OK with these rifles but due to range regs I can't shoot prone so I've been doing most of my shooting sitting (on a seat) which is also strange for me! I still think it'd feel weird prone but perhaps I could compensate better?
What are people's thoughts on pistol Vs standard, I imagine for running about a pistol grip would be advantages but there's no real accuracy benefit one way or the other once accustomed for general shooting on the range?
Thanks for all the replies, didn't really think it would be a hot topic!
Based in Cumbria but don't have an FAC yet so still at the mercy of my air rifle and club guns.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests