I don't quite agree. There are almost none of the top level winners, Palma squad etc, who are using metal stocks, and they are extremely rarely seen riding in the chair so far (maybe once, twice?). There are lots of Swings and Paramounts in evidence amongst these guys and gals.targetman wrote:those at the top of the results lists would be there whatever they shot with but do tend to buy the latest and most expensive kit.
Actually I'd say that F-Open is Formula 1. Massive budgets being spent to develop technology, and a massive dependance on technology throughout. Barrels shot out in less than 1000 rounds etc etc.targetman wrote:Personally I think that Target Rifle has become the "Formula 1" of shooting
I know people tried hard to wring performance out of RG, but I think it was rather futile, but now with quality commercial ammo it's possible to see the difference between a first class rifle and the next best thing (making it worthwhile having the best, if you can make use of it). With RG the difference was masked - whether you combine a 1st class rifle or a 2nd class rifle with agricultural ammo you have an agricultural solution.targetman wrote:Over the years the move to better, purpose made, rifles has been needed to wring the last drop of performance out of the supplied ammunition at Bisley, RG ammunition was always of dubious quality, but at least a decent rifle would get the best out it....thus the new breed of target rifle, all solid actions and long barrels (back to the discussion on stainless -V- chrome-moly) found favour.
With the new ammunition, RUAG, the advantages are somewhat less defined, even a tatty old target rifle like the sort that most us use will perform well with excellent (and pricey) ammunition, even my old Schmidt-Rubin will put in the odd 50.10V with HPS ammo. With handloads even the oldest and outdated rifle can shoot well.
Nothing has drawn me away from English Sporting...such a variety. 