Martini 577 'tater masher...

Pre 1945 action rifles. Muzzle loading.

Moderator: dromia

Message
Author
User avatar
ovenpaa
Posts: 24689
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: Martini 577 'tater masher...

#11 Post by ovenpaa »

I can remember being in the butts when someone took a shot with a 577 from 200m, it hit the left hand wooden upright and all but destroyed it sending me scurrying for cover from flying wood splinters. I radioed the firing point asking the shooter to correct and the next shot hit the left hand side again an inch or so high leaving the frame destroyed. A freight train is a good description...
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
FredB
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:33 pm
Home club or Range: stourport
Location: Wolverhampton
Contact:

Re: Martini 577 'tater masher...

#12 Post by FredB »

WE ARE CONFUSED: probably because Badger called the Martini a 577----it isn't, it is a 45. If the target frame was hit by a 577, it probably came from a Snider-----or a muzzle loader, or a 577 sporting rifle.
I shot a Martini for a few years, but never liked the 577-45 calibre. The case is far too big and the rifles have sloppy chambers because early military ammunition was made from coiled brass. I am a short range shooter and I prefer the original 577 Snider for this. If I need best possible accuracy I also have a Mauser 71/84 in 11.43 x 60.
Much as I love the Martini action for target rifles, for military use it was an evolutionary dead end, being difficult to impossible to convert to a repeater. The Snider was a conversion of a muzzle loader---hence the 577 calibre--- and served its purpose very well, but for a clean sheet of paper design, executed after the Americans had shown the way to repeaters with tubular magazine lever action, the Martini just should not have happened.
Fred
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests