Re: I see the Turks have been getting some trigger time in t
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 11:37 pm
I don't doubt it, was just curious :)
thanks
thanks
All people seeking membership must contact admin after registering to be validated.
https://www.full-bore.co.uk/
You are correct my friend but under the circumstances RT would issue a denial would they not?.If you knew me you would realise I'm intelligent enough to take information from a variety of sources and form my own opinion......I believe it is called free thinking.RDC wrote:RT is hardly a credible news source for any losses of Russian forces. They are as bias in their reporting as Fox News or the Daily Fail. only difference is, they are bias in opposite directions and people tend to believe those that fit their own personal views.
Yet another government false flag?.....I wouldn't be surprised if Is don't start blowing up civilian targets like mosques etc and blaming it on Russian airstrikes in order to stir up trouble.Chuck wrote:OK, there is NOTHING on Turkish news about this happening.
Could be deliberate misinformation given the attack in Ankara..now 95 dead!
Quite a few blaming the government....
I've been following RT for years, just like yourself in order to form an opinion from a few different sources so I can't quite agree they would issue a denial when they have stayed silent on many things.snayperskaya wrote:You are correct my friend but under the circumstances RT would issue a denial would they not?.If you knew me you would realise I'm intelligent enough to take information from a variety of sources and form my own opinion......I believe it is called free thinking.RDC wrote:RT is hardly a credible news source for any losses of Russian forces. They are as bias in their reporting as Fox News or the Daily Fail. only difference is, they are bias in opposite directions and people tend to believe those that fit their own personal views.
On a lot of subjects RT isn't as biased as you think, for example it was one of the first news outlets to show that the "refugee crisis" wasn't all about bedraggled doe-eyed kids and their parents.
Nor IRDC wrote:I've been following RT for years, just like yourself in order to form an opinion from a few different sources so I can't quite agree they would issue a denial when they have stayed silent on many things.snayperskaya wrote:You are correct my friend but under the circumstances RT would issue a denial would they not?.If you knew me you would realise I'm intelligent enough to take information from a variety of sources and form my own opinion......I believe it is called free thinking.RDC wrote:RT is hardly a credible news source for any losses of Russian forces. They are as bias in their reporting as Fox News or the Daily Fail. only difference is, they are bias in opposite directions and people tend to believe those that fit their own personal views.
On a lot of subjects RT isn't as biased as you think, for example it was one of the first news outlets to show that the "refugee crisis" wasn't all about bedraggled doe-eyed kids and their parents.
Still, this isn't GOM, so I won't really comment further.