Page 2 of 3
Re: Nagant M1895
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:18 pm
by ovenpaa
I/we were lucky enough to handle one of these early last year. From an engineering viewpoint it was a work of art and not really something I would associate with the The Glorious Eternal Empire Of Mother Russia
Re: Nagant M1895
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:27 pm
by Christel
Thanks SG and snayperskaya and Saddler, got it now :)
Just could not understand the name, with the unloading and the reloading manually each time.
No doubt Ovenpaa will come along in a minute and say....she is foreign :roll:
Re: Nagant M1895
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:08 pm
by snayperskaya
ovenpaa wrote:I/we were lucky enough to handle one of these early last year. From an engineering viewpoint it was a work of art and not really something I would associate with the The Glorious Eternal Empire Of Mother Russia
Avomat Kalashnikova also engineering art!

Re: Nagant M1895
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:11 pm
by meles meles
'Twas a Belgian design, made for the Tsar and remains in service to this very day with some specialist Russian units (who fit them with Brahmit devices), some reserve rear echelon units and the guards on the national railway service. It works, it isn't broken, so it doesn't need fixing.
Re: Nagant M1895
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 10:30 pm
by TRX
meles meles wrote:'Twas a Belgian design
Actually, a Belgian imitation of a French design, generally known as the "Systeme Delvigne."
The Delvigne pattern spawned a lot of imitators, like all of the almost-Glocks and not-quite-1911s. There were a handful of imitations made in Germany, but the Russians made so many that the design is probably forever associated with them.
Delvigne pistols were made with left or right hand swing-out cylinders, calibers up to .44, and with or without the "gas seal."
The "gas seal" was primarily a means of indexing the cylinder; it got rid of a bunch of machining and precision fitting. Each chamber indexes precisely on the end of the barrel, so there are no "bad" or "good" chambers. No particular precision was required, other than indexing close enough for the chamfers to match up.
The Nagant also had a transfer bar safety, double action trigger, and a swinging breechblock which served to lock the cylinder forward on firing, and prevented fired cases from backing out and jamming the action.
I'd love to have a Delvigne/Peiper/Nagant pattern revolver in .357 Magnum...
Re: Nagant M1895
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 11:24 pm
by Charlie Muggins
I somewhat fancy the idea of a nagant fitted with a gas piston and a trigger disconnector. Mateba eat your heart out!
Re: Nagant M1895
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 6:56 am
by meles meles
And would Sir like that with copper plating and burl walnut grips?
Re: Nagant M1895
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:34 pm
by Charlie Muggins
meles meles wrote:And would Sir like that with copper plating and burl walnut grips?
Well I be accused of uphill gardening? Cos that would upset my boyfriend.
Re: Nagant M1895
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 7:36 am
by etprescottuk
The double action trigger pull is horrendous, the single action pull is stiff. The example I fired (1943 Izhevsk arsenal rebuild) shot way to the left, it was the revolver, not me, and using the anemic Serbian ammunition I found for it you could practically see the bullet leave the barrel. These are interesting to check out and if given a chance fire one though Western shooters have not been deprived not having these things.
Re: Nagant M1895
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:36 am
by DanTheMan
I have one along with a TT33 on 7.3, it also shoots about a foot to the left but quite accurate in single action.
Reloading is a bit interesting as there are many ways of producing ammo, even down to using .32 S&W long, but the NRA have ppu 7.62x38 brass so found this works best and gives the gas seal. You seat the recessed bullet then can use a .30 carbine size die to truncate over it.
