Page 2 of 2
Re: Deer culling.
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 6:37 pm
by meles meles
We put it down to stupidity...
Re: Deer culling.
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:08 pm
by mag41uk
Jenks wrote:mag41uk wrote:I see it was a high velocity rifle and not a medium velocity rifle!
Tony
mag41uk
I think I get your drift. Perhaps it would be more appropriate to refer to the the cartridge as 'high velocity' rather than the rifle. I think most of us would probably agree that a cartridge that produces as in this case a MV of 3,300 fps is indeed 'high velocity cartridge'. where perhaps a .303 British at 2400fps might be described as medium velocity etc. Notwithstanding that, did you think that the article and film put over the necessity for deer management/culling?
Jenks..
I thought it was actually a very good article.
Tony
Re: Deer culling.
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:08 pm
by Jenks
tackb wrote:as that sort of thing goes I didn't think it was to bad?
tackb..
as that sort of thing goes I didn't think it was to bad?
I have just read this thread through again. I'm not sure what you mean by your response. Do you doubt the necessity for humane culling as described by Chris Howard? I was a little thrown by your use of a question mark at the end of your post. What wasn't too bad?
Jenks
Re: Deer culling.
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 11:02 pm
by meles meles
Jenks wrote:
Do you doubt the necessity for humane culling as described by Chris Howard?
Jenks
We're putting forward a plan for ooman culling...
Re: Deer culling.
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:42 am
by the running man
Jenks, I suspect he was referring to the article being ok as far as articles go.....I personally thought it was good 8 out of 10 from me.....
Re: Deer culling.
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 3:04 pm
by Provider
Not a bad article. The roebuck managed to change into a fallow though. :lol: