Unprofessional behaviour of Met FET

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
breacher

Re: Unprofessional behaviour of Met FET

#71 Post by breacher »

Out of curiousity - what were the 7 slots for ?
wildrover77
Posts: 268
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:04 pm
Location: Scarborough
Contact:

Re: Unprofessional behaviour of Met FET

#72 Post by wildrover77 »

I fail to see how limiting the number of guns on the first application is mitigating risk. If you have to prove you are safe by not misusing your gun before you are allowed another I would question the methodology of he system.
User avatar
Dellboy
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 2635
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:49 am
Home club or Range: Star Shooting Club
Location: Essex
Contact:

Re: Unprofessional behaviour of Met FET

#73 Post by Dellboy »

wildrover77 wrote:I fail to see how limiting the number of guns on the first application is mitigating risk. If you have to prove you are safe by not misusing your gun before you are allowed another I would question the methodology of he system.

You can be suprised how gun ho people can get sfter their first purchase
2020 GOOD DEALS WITH

Cutch Vortex Scope
Mauserbill Enfield Books


Enjoy today as tomorrow might not come .

Noli pati a scelestis opprimi.

002515
pbrazendale

Re: Unprofessional behaviour of Met FET

#74 Post by pbrazendale »

I've been granted 6 firearms and 3 mods on a first grant I'm under GMP and they were fine as long as I had storage and good reasons.

This sounds like a downhill spiral, the comment of 'guns on street' is like brandishing all licence holders as criminals and that is completely wrong, is be challenging this as much you can.


Sent from my boing using "An application"
Rambles35

Re: Unprofessional behaviour of Met FET

#75 Post by Rambles35 »

I asked for 3 slots on first application, with 600 rounds of each calibre.
Got what I wanted.
That was in Sussex. Turnaround time was about 2 weeks.
Rockhopper
Posts: 912
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 2:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Unprofessional behaviour of Met FET

#76 Post by Rockhopper »

Five on initial grant - no questions asked.
lapua338
Posts: 521
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: Surrey
Contact:

Re: Unprofessional behaviour of Met FET

#77 Post by lapua338 »

I fail to see how limiting the number of guns on the first application is mitigating risk. If you have to prove you are safe by not misusing your gun before you are allowed another I would question the methodology of the system.
Agreed. Fewer and fewer people seem to understand this.
You can be surprised how gung-ho people can get after their first purchase
I've no idea what this statement implies? Of course the applicant is an enthusiastic member of our shooting community. However, I feel this statement is petty, derogatory, Yardley-esque and has no credibility.

The applicant's choices are his own within our legal rights.

I have realised this forum has few like-minded people and the critics and naysayers undermine everything I and many others hold dear. Normal for me is being surrounded by people who are ready to do what needs to be done. Abnormal, to me, is the man or woman who doesn't have the skeletal structure to stand up for principles.

I no longer wish to be part of this forum. Goodbye!
bhodge

Re: Unprofessional behaviour of Met FET

#78 Post by bhodge »

I have no strong opinion one way or the other, at the end of the day it means nothing to me. I have what I requested and I'm a happy shooter...
Dummy well and truly spat, or so it seems.
User avatar
DL.
Posts: 1634
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:24 am
Contact:

Re: Unprofessional behaviour of Met FET

#79 Post by DL. »

lapua338 wrote:Goodbye!
Cheerio! :wave:
GeeRam

Re: Unprofessional behaviour of Met FET

#80 Post by GeeRam »

bhodge wrote: Dummy well and truly spat, or so it seems.
So it would seem.

It's going to be an interesting conversation in a couple of weeks time when I next see the person who is the subject of this thread :squirrel:
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests