The Wisdom of Mike Yardley

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
Fedaykin

Re: The Wisdom of Mike Yardley

#21 Post by Fedaykin »

Part 2
Attachments
Y2.PNG
Fedaykin

Re: The Wisdom of Mike Yardley

#22 Post by Fedaykin »

Part 3
Attachments
Y3.PNG
Fedaykin

Re: The Wisdom of Mike Yardley

#23 Post by Fedaykin »

Part 4, the last exchange nearly made me pi$$ myself it was so funny!
Attachments
Y4.PNG
saddler

Re: The Wisdom of Mike Yardley

#24 Post by saddler »

Awww.....selective amnesia. ...bless!
Or has he got a posh form of dementia?
User avatar
phaedra1106
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Just outside Sacriston (the nice bit!)
Contact:

Re: The Wisdom of Mike Yardley

#25 Post by phaedra1106 »

saddler wrote:Or has he got a posh form of dementia?
Yes, it's a rare form of cerebral degeneration, the concise medical term for it is "Dick Head" :good:
There's room for all Gods creatures, next to the mash and gravy :)
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7852
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: The Wisdom of Mike Yardley

#26 Post by Blackstuff »

I don't know where all of you are getting the 'posh boy' persona from, you clearly hear him in that Merkel video saying "...side b' side..." He's one of the people, you oiks! lol
DVC
User avatar
Chuck
Posts: 23989
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:23 am
Location: Planet Earth - Mainly
Contact:

Re: The Wisdom of Mike Yardley

#27 Post by Chuck »

ERRRR, I did mean to write "living in his own wee WORLD"...but I suppose with the amount of it he talks he's immersed in it most days...

I would see anyone standing up for their enshrined in law RIGHTS as an extremeist. A dangerous term to use because it soon gets pointed at others...In the USA it seems ANYONE who likes huinting / sjooting / fishing / guns (and / or the Bible) is an extremist - whereas those who demonstrate against them and want them and the police dead are just expressing freedom of speech teanews
Political Correctness is the language of lies, written by the corrupt , spoken by the inept!
User avatar
Dark Skies
Posts: 2860
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:02 am
Home club or Range: NRA
Contact:

Re: The Wisdom of Mike Yardley

#28 Post by Dark Skies »

Fedaykin wrote:So to start off today Yardley has been having fun on Facebook after the recent BBC report, so first some Yardley Wisdom.

Complains we are at each others throats without any self awareness that he is a source of discord:

I took the opportunity to write a reasonable response to his Facebook post. I take it as a compliment to my argument that he could not muster a worthy reply and chose to delete it instead.

"To be fair you have played your own part in dividing and conquering. I speak, of course, of your own stance regarding legal ownership / shooting military style rifles, or rather, military lookalike rifles. One merely has to google your name to see just how much you have upset a large section of the shooting population for the truth of this.

These rifles are either .22 rim-fire rifles in semi-auto or single shot straight pull bolt action. People like to shoot them because well, they're fun and very accurate. And that surely is good enough reason to own them.

You have demonized owners as Rambo wannabes in print and on the Internet - annoying shooters and pandering to those who seek gun control or even banning our sport altogether.

Not a very sensible stance in my view.
Let us assume that these were removed from public ownership - another raid on our right to enjoy legally owned property and enforced compensation paid for by the taxpayer, what do you think the next step would be by the anti-shooting brigade?

I'm guessing the next logical step would be to continue the theme and move on to banning actual military rifles such as the much loved Lee Enfield, the Mosin Nagant, Mausers, and similar. Having accepted / tolerated the loss of black rifles we would be accused of being unreasonable in resisting this move. A precedent will already have been set. Then what do you think might be the next step? I think bolt action rifles used by the police - Remington, Savage, and similar.

Eventually, having progressed this far and emboldened by success perhaps the ant-shooting sports would then address something I actually find rather repulsive myself - shooting dumb animals for sport and posing by their sad carcasses. There's no need to defend your own love of killing things - we will not agree on this. Suffice to say my own feelings are that this is a matter for your own conscience - mine is clear and I have no desire to enforce my views on others regarding hunting sports - that would be divisive."
"I don't like my job and I don't think I'm gonna go anymore."
saddler

Re: The Wisdom of Mike Yardley

#29 Post by saddler »

Dark Skies wrote:
Fedaykin wrote:So to start off today Yardley has been having fun on Facebook after the recent BBC report, so first some Yardley Wisdom.

Complains we are at each others throats without any self awareness that he is a source of discord:

I took the opportunity to write a reasonable response to his Facebook post. I take it as a compliment to my argument that he could not muster a worthy reply and chose to delete it instead.

"To be fair you have played your own part in dividing and conquering. I speak, of course, of your own stance regarding legal ownership / shooting military style rifles, or rather, military lookalike rifles. One merely has to google your name to see just how much you have upset a large section of the shooting population for the truth of this.

These rifles are either .22 rim-fire rifles in semi-auto or single shot straight pull bolt action. People like to shoot them because well, they're fun and very accurate. And that surely is good enough reason to own them.

You have demonized owners as Rambo wannabes in print and on the Internet - annoying shooters and pandering to those who seek gun control or even banning our sport altogether.

Not a very sensible stance in my view.
Let us assume that these were removed from public ownership - another raid on our right to enjoy legally owned property and enforced compensation paid for by the taxpayer, what do you think the next step would be by the anti-shooting brigade?

I'm guessing the next logical step would be to continue the theme and move on to banning actual military rifles such as the much loved Lee Enfield, the Mosin Nagant, Mausers, and similar. Having accepted / tolerated the loss of black rifles we would be accused of being unreasonable in resisting this move. A precedent will already have been set. Then what do you think might be the next step? I think bolt action rifles used by the police - Remington, Savage, and similar.

Eventually, having progressed this far and emboldened by success perhaps the ant-shooting sports would then address something I actually find rather repulsive myself - shooting dumb animals for sport and posing by their sad carcasses. There's no need to defend your own love of killing things - we will not agree on this. Suffice to say my own feelings are that this is a matter for your own conscience - mine is clear and I have no desire to enforce my views on others regarding hunting sports - that would be divisive."
You missed off the bit about how he really has no need to wear a big white hunter man around the veldt type hat, as most people already have a good idea that he's a complete tw@
User avatar
Dark Skies
Posts: 2860
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:02 am
Home club or Range: NRA
Contact:

Re: The Wisdom of Mike Yardley

#30 Post by Dark Skies »

saddler wrote: You missed off the bit about how he really has no need to wear a big white hunter man around the veldt type hat, as most people already have a good idea that he's a complete tw@
His hats are in keeping with his cock of the walk attitude. I am happy to meet him half way and agree that he is indeed a ....
"I don't like my job and I don't think I'm gonna go anymore."
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2 guests