Police revoke champion shot’s ticket over drink prank video

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
SevenSixTwo

Re: Police revoke champion shot’s ticket over drink prank vi

#21 Post by SevenSixTwo »

breacher wrote:
They need to be stored securely when not in USE. Your use of them is not restricted other than by law and your FAC conditions.
Okay. For argument's sake then; say I'd like to USE my firearms as ornaments

I'm being OTT of course but I think my point stands.
Little Phil

Re: Police revoke champion shot’s ticket over drink prank vi

#22 Post by Little Phil »

Bottom line, don't act daft when in control of a firearm, most definatly do not film said daft behaviour and post it anywhere.
Phil*
breacher

Re: Police revoke champion shot’s ticket over drink prank vi

#23 Post by breacher »

SevenSixTwo wrote:
breacher wrote:
They need to be stored securely when not in USE. Your use of them is not restricted other than by law and your FAC conditions.
Okay. For argument's sake then; say I'd like to USE my firearms as ornaments

I'm being OTT of course but I think my point stands.
No - you are perfectly entitled to use them as ornaments. As long as in compliance with your condition of securing them as soon as that use ends.

Of course, you are also required to secure them whilst in use so you would need to be physically in charge of them.
SevenSixTwo

Re: Police revoke champion shot’s ticket over drink prank vi

#24 Post by SevenSixTwo »

So you can carry one slung across your back all day long in the house, worn as a fashion accessory - and the police would be fine with that? Come on, you know they wouldn't be.
User avatar
Chuck
Posts: 23988
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:23 am
Location: Planet Earth - Mainly
Contact:

Re: Police revoke champion shot’s ticket over drink prank vi

#25 Post by Chuck »

Didn't end too well for this guy either:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... rs-by.html
Unlike one Thomas Hamilton.....he was allowed to carry on until he went mental.
Political Correctness is the language of lies, written by the corrupt , spoken by the inept!
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7847
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Police revoke champion shot’s ticket over drink prank vi

#26 Post by Blackstuff »

SevenSixTwo wrote:So you can carry one slung across your back all day long in the house, worn as a fashion accessory - and the police would be fine with that? Come on, you know they wouldn't be.
Would be the only issue if the police somehow managed to find out you'd being doing it, and you gave that as the reason. There are several good reasons why you may wish to carry/wear a gun in the house for extended periods.

Going on a rough shoot/proper deer stalking and needing to test the comfort/fit/durability of a sling, for example.

I, (and many other 'practical') practice moving around the house with our guns as a drill for tight space movement for courses of fire that require it. IMO its essential to build up your muscle memory for keeping your muzzle in a safe direction (and not muzzle sweeping your own feet!) while moving around obstacles/barriers etc. As long as no one can see in the house and hence can't get 'alarmed' by seeing someone with a gun ( 8-) ), then its perfectly legal to do so.
DVC
Gaz

Re: Police revoke champion shot’s ticket over drink prank vi

#27 Post by Gaz »

Little Phil wrote:Bottom line, don't act daft when in control of a firearm, most definatly do not film said daft behaviour and post it anywhere.
Phil*
Agreed. He certainly should have got a hats-on-no-coffee from his FEO, but the police jumping straight to the nuclear option helps nobody and certainly doesn't encourage public confidence in their ability to provide a proportionate, measured response.
breacher

Re: Police revoke champion shot’s ticket over drink prank vi

#28 Post by breacher »

SevenSixTwo wrote:So you can carry one slung across your back all day long in the house, worn as a fashion accessory - and the police would be fine with that? Come on, you know they wouldn't be.
Well, I must admit I am playing Devils Advocate but the Firearms Act has never defined use. Case law has generally accepted use as any lawful activity.

As to what the Police can be fine with ? They can only take action if you commit a crime, breach your conditions or you are of intemperate character ( drink / drugs / other activity likely to affect safety )
saddler

Re: Police revoke champion shot’s ticket over drink prank vi

#29 Post by saddler »

Blackstuff wrote:
SevenSixTwo wrote:So you can carry one slung across your back all day long in the house, worn as a fashion accessory - and the police would be fine with that? Come on, you know they wouldn't be.
Would be the only issue if the police somehow managed to find out you'd being doing it, and you gave that as the reason. There are several good reasons why you may wish to carry/wear a gun in the house for extended periods.

Going on a rough shoot/proper deer stalking and needing to test the comfort/fit/durability of a sling, for example.

I, (and many other 'practical') practice moving around the house with our guns as a drill for tight space movement for courses of fire that require it. IMO its essential to build up your muscle memory for keeping your muzzle in a safe direction (and not muzzle sweeping your own feet!) while moving around obstacles/barriers etc. As long as no one can see in the house and hence can't get 'alarmed' by seeing someone with a gun ( 8-) ), then its perfectly legal to do so.
I can just picture it
Your lass & her mates on the sofa getting stuck into the wine & snacks watching a chick flick....and you're doing tactical drills up & down the hallway in all your ninja kit!
She must have one hell of a set of excuses memorised already. ...
nigelc

Re: Police revoke champion shot’s ticket over drink prank vi

#30 Post by nigelc »

Got to say I am with the Police on this one - as one other poster said "one less fool with a FAC/SGC".
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests