RPG-7 vs 16 inches of bullet proof glass

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
Hunter87

RPG-7 vs 16 inches of bullet proof glass

#1 Post by Hunter87 »

My next variation is going to be for one of these......for target shooting ect

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e10_1442846482
User avatar
TattooedGun
Posts: 2518
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:55 am
Home club or Range: Dudley Rifle Club, UKPSA, Bromsgrove
Location: West Midlands
Contact:

Re: RPG-7 vs 16 inches of bullet proof glass

#2 Post by TattooedGun »

I gotta wonder how it would do with half the glass but with gaps between each sheet.

I think I read/saw about buffers being used to create a new surface which requires more energy to break each new pane of glass than the initial impact breaking the solid block of glass and every piece behind it because they're touching...

Also add that effect with placing the glass in triangles within the box:

Code: Select all

-------------------
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
-------------------
I'm sure you could stop more with less glass.

Deflection... or something... #NotAPhysicist
breacher

Re: RPG-7 vs 16 inches of bullet proof glass

#3 Post by breacher »

I believe 12 bore slug is particularly effective against bullet "proof" glass.
User avatar
meles meles
Posts: 6335
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: RPG-7 vs 16 inches of bullet proof glass

#4 Post by meles meles »

We knows a thing or two* 'bout armour, ooman. It's down to things like the Gibbs Free Energy and complicated stuff like fracture mechanics, impedance and elastic modulus mismatching, stress transmission and energy absorption. In a nutshell, it generally requires more energy to start a crack than to propagate one, hence modern armours are more multi-layer laminates with vastly differing impedance betwixt adjacent layers. Add in a few hard layers to try and shatter the incoming projectile, a few tough ones to destabilise it, a few brittle ones to send it elsewhere along a line of lesser resistance...

Well, we think you get the idea...







* But not everything. Quite...
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 20230
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: RPG-7 vs 16 inches of bullet proof glass

#5 Post by dromia »

My work for RPGs but it is obviously useless against sumps.
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
User avatar
pe4king
Posts: 1402
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Home club or Range: Lydd Rifle Club.
Location: Rainham, Kent.
Contact:

Re: RPG-7 vs 16 inches of bullet proof glass

#6 Post by pe4king »

The Monroe effect tis a wonderful thing, as is miznay schardin
3-4 million psi
What is a Sapper? This versatile genius condenses the whole system of military engineering and all that is useful and practical. He is a man of all work of the Army and the public ready to do anything or go anywhere, in short, he is a Sapper.
User avatar
meles meles
Posts: 6335
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: RPG-7 vs 16 inches of bullet proof glass

#7 Post by meles meles »

Oh indeedy, but not difficult to overcome with a spark of imagination and touch of elektrikkery, or even an elastic band...
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
ordnance
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:00 pm
Location: N. Ireland. UK.
Contact:

Re: RPG-7 vs 16 inches of bullet proof glass

#8 Post by ordnance »

Oh indeedy, but not difficult to overcome with a spark of imagination and touch of elektrikkery, or even an elastic band...
Its difficult enough, armored vehicle manufacturers have being trying to come up with defences against shaped charge warheads since ww2 with varying success. ERA for example isn't always effective.
User avatar
TattooedGun
Posts: 2518
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:55 am
Home club or Range: Dudley Rifle Club, UKPSA, Bromsgrove
Location: West Midlands
Contact:

Re: RPG-7 vs 16 inches of bullet proof glass

#9 Post by TattooedGun »

Oooh, I like this thread... give me more....!!
saddler

Re: RPG-7 vs 16 inches of bullet proof glass

#10 Post by saddler »

I don't understand - is it to do with insurance?
Not fluent in Meerkat...
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests