.243 - is it actually any good ?

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
meles meles
Posts: 6335
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:
Contact meles meles

.243 - is it actually any good ?

#1 Post by meles meles »

Continuing our education on matters .243", oomans, we're wondering what the .243 offers that isn't done better by 6.5x55 or sundry other 6.5mm rounds. Apart from being a short action cartridge, we can't see that it has any advantage over the Swedish 6.5
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Top
Swamp Donkey

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#2 Post by Swamp Donkey »

It has the advantage of being the smallest we can use on deer, so relatively easy to get granted early on in people's shooting careers, whereas a 6.bowl???? Is "omg big" in most feo's eyes
Top
tackb

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#3 Post by tackb »

Why compare 6.5mm to 6mm ?
Top
User avatar
meles meles
Posts: 6335
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:
Contact meles meles

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#4 Post by meles meles »

Because, ooman, we're after a Bambi blatter and our FEO suggests a .243 whereas we prefer a 6.5
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Top
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 20226
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:
Contact dromia

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#5 Post by dromia »

You need at least one of each.
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit
http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
Top
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10752
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:
Contact Sim G

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#6 Post by Sim G »

Both will kill deer with aplomb and punch targets, likewise. I like the .243 because of the short action and the mind boggling selection of bullets available. Because of its popularity in the UK, you will never run short of co ponents or factory ammo.
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Top
User avatar
Les
Posts: 4561
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:19 pm
Home club or Range: WRPC
Location: Runcorn, via Africa and parts unknown.
Contact:
Contact Les

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#7 Post by Les »

meles meles wrote:Because, ooman, we're after a Bambi blatter and our FEO suggests a .243 whereas we prefer a 6.5
Play along with the FEO and get a .243, then apply for a 6.5 later. Simples. :good:
Top
User avatar
kennyc
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:21 pm
Home club or Range: hunters NRPC
Location: Reading West Berks
Contact:
Contact kennyc

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#8 Post by kennyc »

Les wrote:
meles meles wrote:Because, ooman, we're after a Bambi blatter and our FEO suggests a .243 whereas we prefer a 6.5
Play along with the FEO and get a .243, then apply for a 6.5 later. Simples. :good:
or you could ask the FEO exactly how a .243 is safer than a 6.5x55 ?
and thats before asking whether or not the .243 is actually Deer legal in terms of muzzle energy in the shorter barrel lengths prefered by some modern hunters.
Top
Blu

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#9 Post by Blu »

Badger there's only one thing for it, get both calibres. Hey you can never have too many guns old son.
Top
tackb

Re: .243 - is it actually any good ?

#10 Post by tackb »

Get a 260 and make the ammo from 243 cases ?
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Reloading and Ammunition”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests