Ok, I promised info on that CT system and here it is

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
Sixshot6

Ok, I promised info on that CT system and here it is

#1 Post by Sixshot6 »

http://www.ctguntalk.com/smf/index.php/ ... 457.0.html

The whole thread of the guy unveiling it as sorts is here. He won't reveal any pics or anything as he appears to be a bit of a perfectionist and getting him to reveal this much has taken a while. He believes it's uk legal, but how he describes it makes me feel unsure. Does anyone want to read and see what they think?
Sixshot6

Re: Ok, I promised info on that CT system and here it is

#2 Post by Sixshot6 »

If you read the thread, you'll notice me in there asking questions too. I did get him to look at UK legislation and he's seems to think it checks out.
User avatar
phaedra1106
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Just outside Sacriston (the nice bit!)
Contact:

Re: Ok, I promised info on that CT system and here it is

#3 Post by phaedra1106 »

No idea, MalwareBytes blocks it as a malicious website.

"Malwarebytes Anti-Malware will alert users when network traffic is blocked to a website, URL, or IP address that has been found to host malicious content. Since the network traffic is blocked, the malicious IP address is unable to connect to your computer - In most cases nothing needs be done, our protection has blocked the threat from infecting you. "
There's room for all Gods creatures, next to the mash and gravy :)
Sixshot6

Re: Ok, I promised info on that CT system and here it is

#4 Post by Sixshot6 »

phaedra1106 wrote:No idea, MalwareBytes blocks it as a malicious website.

"Malwarebytes Anti-Malware will alert users when network traffic is blocked to a website, URL, or IP address that has been found to host malicious content. Since the network traffic is blocked, the malicious IP address is unable to connect to your computer - In most cases nothing needs be done, our protection has blocked the threat from infecting you. "
Very strange, my antivirus has never done that. Very weird. But if anyone else gets in and can offer up some legalise opinion it will be a bit better.

Anyway for people who can't get in, this is how he describes the action (note the use of a fully moderated barrel as its an outgrowth of his work with them).

Pull the trigger, and the rifle fires. The bolt stays CLOSED, forcing all the gas to go through the suppressor. No blowback. No backblast. No gas blasting out of the ejection port nor out from under the charging handle and into your eyes.

When you RELEASE the trigger, which could be a split second, or 10 seconds later, THEN the bolt will go back, extracting and ejecting the spent cartridge, then chamber the next round.

;D

Does anyone see that as being uk legal? To elaborate, the bolt stays closed, the firearm does not need to be silenced but apparently its as costly to make an Un-silenced version.
Brookers

Re: Ok, I promised info on that CT system and here it is

#5 Post by Brookers »

Section 5,

As I understand it the action needs two manual operations to fire a shot to be section 1. I would suggest that pulling and releasing the trigger will be viewed as one operation even though the pull and release do two different operations.

Brookers
Sixshot6

Re: Ok, I promised info on that CT system and here it is

#6 Post by Sixshot6 »

Brookers wrote:Section 5,

As I understand it the action needs two manual operations to fire a shot to be section 1. I would suggest that pulling and releasing the trigger will be viewed as one operation even though the pull and release do two different operations.

Brookers
That is what I thought, the fact that the action closes is a moot point (the action closing until release could still be viewed as a moot point). Somone else can chime in but even with the action closing and need the trigger released to open to rechamber the next shot. Disappointing but there are other avenues.
breacher

Re: Ok, I promised info on that CT system and here it is

#7 Post by breacher »

Section 5.
Sixshot6

Re: Ok, I promised info on that CT system and here it is

#8 Post by Sixshot6 »

breacher wrote:Section 5.
Just as I thought. To be fair, I have been asking and even on some US forums, there is debate over whether it will fly in places like New York and the like (one suspected a court case would brew) so the section 5 idea seems to have reached a consensus.
Sixshot6

Re: Ok, I promised info on that CT system and here it is

#10 Post by Sixshot6 »

safetyfirst wrote:Section 5.
I'll guess I'll have to stick with the MARS and the other stuff that might be coming. It was worth a try and so many people here were up for it. I'm sorry guys. I hope no is too disappointed, part of me knew it would end up not being the solution and another part of me wanted it so bad to be the solution. I cannot apologize enough.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests