





Moderator: dromia
Was. Not is. The problems have been resolved.zanes wrote:"Any assertion that the judge upheld Miss B-L's case because the NRA is not operating a secure section 5 armoury is false".
Whilst this may be true, the whole case came about because the NRA is not operating a secure section 5 armoury.
A fair point- I would edit my post but I'm past the edit time. Doh.techguy wrote:Was. Not is. The problems have been resolved.zanes wrote:"Any assertion that the judge upheld Miss B-L's case because the NRA is not operating a secure section 5 armoury is false".
Whilst this may be true, the whole case came about because the NRA is not operating a secure section 5 armoury.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 9 guests