Steve E wrote:meles meles wrote:Run in ?
Don't start us on that owd chestnut, ooman ! A properly made barrel requires no running in. A barrel that requires running in hasn't been made right !
It's not the barrel but the leade that needs running in. No matter how good your reamer, no matter how good the machinist, when the chamber is cut the lead will have machining marks. Look at these with a boroscope and they look like the teeth on a b****** file. It is these marks that you are evening out/removing by running in your barrel. This is the area that will attract most fouling if not done properly.
Are you really going to tell the likes of Krieger, Bartlein, Obermeyer etc that they are wrong and that the advice they give to their customers is bull.
I know who and what I believe and you are not a one of them. I trust my barrel makers,I trust my machinist/rifle smith. I don't trust striped mono-chrome mammals, who have no pedigree.
If you always do what you have always done, you'll always get what you always got.
Modern machining has moved on, ooman. We re-iterate: If a barrel needs running in, it hasn't been properly made. By that, we mean it hasn't been made with the best available tekkernoloji and an understanding of state of the art machining practice. A modern rifle barrel such as that developed for CHARM (go google) can hit a target, first time, at 3000 mards, with considerably less than 1 MoA accuracy, every time. It uses ESR (electro slag refined) steel and is machined such that the first round it ever fires is its most accurate.
Modern machinists have PhDs, often several of them, not greasy paws and swarf in their tea...