BTW .333" does sound rather large for a 7.62 in front of the case mouth.
Just commenting not doubting your measurements.
chamber impact impressions
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.
Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.
Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
-
dromia
- Site Admin
- Posts: 20226
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
- Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
- Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
- Contact:
Re: chamber impact impressions
Come on Bambi get some
Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad
Fecking stones
Real farmers don't need subsidies
Cow's farts matter!
For fine firearms and requisites visit
http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
Re: chamber impact impressions
Right so it looks like my original thoughts on using a .313 is way of the mark then.
-
mag41uk
- Posts: 1847
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:50 pm
- Home club or Range: Aldershot R & P Club
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
Re: chamber impact impressions
FWIW I have an AIA 7.62 x 39 and use 0.314 bullets.
Have yet to have a positive experience with them!
Factory Tula works very well in mine and its cheap.
Tony
Have yet to have a positive experience with them!
Factory Tula works very well in mine and its cheap.
Tony
Re: chamber impact impressions
Is that a .314 cast bullet.FWIW I have an AIA 7.62 x 39 and use 0.314 bullets.
Have yet to have a positive experience with them!
Factory Tula works very well in mine and its cheap.
Tony
You might be right Adam Ill measure it again. That's another reason I wanted to do a couple more and get a average. As I said this is a total grey area to me. Its all a learning curve. Or maybe I just walloped it to hard.
-
dromia
- Site Admin
- Posts: 20226
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
- Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
- Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
- Contact:
Re: chamber impact impressions
Getting more and an average is good but I doubt it will be far off the first one, that is the beauty of this method the impression is what it is.
Come on Bambi get some
Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad
Fecking stones
Real farmers don't need subsidies
Cow's farts matter!
For fine firearms and requisites visit
http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
Re: chamber impact impressions
So what sort of measurement would you have expected out of curiosity. Recommend me a mould one of NOE making or what ever.BTW .333" does sound rather large for a 7.62 in front of the case mouth.
Just commenting not doubting your measurements.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests