I agree and I do hope they are better now. I knew about the problems before I bought my .357, decided to give them the benefit of the doubt then had nothing but problems so have learnt first hand to never buy a Remlin again. I don't blame Marlin, it's Remington's fault. Can't beat old guns when the accountants didn't get a say. Older the better IMO.Sim G wrote:Where you off to? Can you not take it with you? By all means get in touch if it's to go!
Remington produced Marlins are now so much better. Remington have actually employed some of the people they laid off when they moved the factory, so I'm led to believe. Some of the collectors association in the US reckon the new ones from the factory today are as good as those produced on the last day in New Haven, but, I reckon the damage is well and truly done. To get their reputation back, they're going to have to be twice as good and sell for half!
Now if you want it compare night and day quality, I have a first year production 1894. In fact it's probably just had its 120th birthday! Compared to rifles made 100 years after it, is chalk and cheese. I don't know what it was back then, but boy, is it good.... And it still shoots a storm!!
I'm heading out to Australia. Legally I could take it with me because it's not "military looking"
