55-62-69

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
SevenSixTwo

Re: 55-62-69

#21 Post by SevenSixTwo »

Thanks, makes sense.

What should my expectations be then if I stick with the 62gr? With a 'lighter' charge, will performance be significantly worse?

Would I get better results with a lighter 55 or heavier 69? Yeah, I know - 'results' is a bit vague... :lol:
John MH

Re: 55-62-69

#22 Post by John MH »

55 Grain bullets aren't used in SS109 and where are you going to get WC844?
Blu

Re: 55-62-69

#23 Post by Blu »

Quite a few folks over here replicate the military round or try to. Below is a photo with both WC844 and H335 as you can see they are pretty much as close as you can get, in the absence of WC844 they use the H335. They also use the US Army load data from the Army tech spec sheet.
The attachment wc-844-military-rifle-powder-like-hodgdon-h335.jpg is no longer available
wc-844-military-rifle-powder-like-hodgdon-h335.jpg
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10752
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: 55-62-69

#24 Post by Sim G »

I've been using H335 for years, a great powder for .223 and regarded as a "classic".

Hodgdon says,
Originated as a military powder, used for the 5.56 NATO, or 223 Remington as handloaders know it.
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
SevenSixTwo

Re: 55-62-69

#25 Post by SevenSixTwo »

Is that also good for 7.62 NATO?

I'm betting it won't be! :lol: ;)
User avatar
Sandgroper
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 4735
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: 55-62-69

#26 Post by Sandgroper »

SevenSixTwo wrote:Is that also good for 7.62 NATO?

I'm betting it won't be! :lol: ;)
Well, if it's good enough for 308 Win, I'm guessing it'll be good enough for 7.62 NATO...
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
Blu

Re: 55-62-69

#27 Post by Blu »

SevenSixTwo wrote:Is that also good for 7.62 NATO?

I'm betting it won't be! :lol: ;)
:roll:
Army Reloading.pdf
SevenSixTwo

Re: 55-62-69

#28 Post by SevenSixTwo »

So, I'm GTG for the 62gr. Thanks all.
John MH

Re: 55-62-69

#29 Post by John MH »

If you are going to go to the bother of reloading why spend the time using a ballistically inferior and frankly lower quality bullet? NATO 'spec' reloads may well produce NATO 'spec' accuracy which would seem to make the exercise pointless. Very good quality 69 grain target bullets can be had for reasonable cost and should shoot groups at least half the size of that achievable with a 62 grain FMJ surplus bullet.
SevenSixTwo

Re: 55-62-69

#30 Post by SevenSixTwo »

John MH wrote:If you are going to go to the bother of reloading why spend the time using a ballistically inferior and frankly lower quality bullet? NATO 'spec' reloads may well produce NATO 'spec' accuracy which would seem to make the exercise pointless. Very good quality 69 grain target bullets can be had for reasonable cost and should shoot groups at least half the size of that achievable with a 62 grain FMJ surplus bullet.
That's what I was originally asking; 55-62-69? I'll be reloading from GGG/PPU (and nothing else) and my question was 'which weight' would be better in the absense of 62gr.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests