.260 Remington C.O.A.L

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
Swamp Donkey

Re: .260 Remington C.O.A.L

#11 Post by Swamp Donkey »

Laurie, as you are in the 'load zone', do you have any data yet for RL33 in .338LM ? Specifically, under a 285 gr amax.

Cheers

Pete
Laurie

Re: .260 Remington C.O.A.L

#12 Post by Laurie »

338LM? Sorry - way too big and expensive a cartridge for me!

Actually Alliant Re33 is a Swiss Nitro-Chemie powder developed for the .338LM likely in its RUAG military loading. It's N-C's EI-N170EA powder, shortly to be available in the UK as Reload Swiss RS80. If you google RUAG 338LM, its standard loading(s) may be available somewhere. Otherwise with a bit of luck, 338LM will be covered in the N-C Reload Swiss loads data when it's released, which is supposed to be pretty soon.
HALODIN

Re: .260 Remington C.O.A.L

#13 Post by HALODIN »

I had decided to use the COAL from lapua's site at 2.795" (page 22), but I can see this is something I need to look more carefully at. Thanks for the info!

http://www.lapua.com/upload/downloads/b ... ed9eng.pdf
pe4king wrote:I load mine to 2.826" seems to work for me, but whatever suits your rifle start at 2.800" and take it from there.
HALODIN

Re: .260 Remington C.O.A.L

#14 Post by HALODIN »

Thanks for taking the time to write that out, I understand your points in terms of accuracy and safety. It would seem you've convinced me to buy an OAL gauge, which do you recommend?
Laurie wrote:In very broad terms, yes that's correct. The quoted cartridge OAL for each individual bullet should fit a chamber with a throat / leade configuration that complies with the minimum SAAMI value for that area. That assumes we're talking mass produced factory rifles. Any custom, or rebarrellled rifle may or may not be 100% SAAMI compliant.
...
User avatar
jcampbellsmith
Posts: 441
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:20 pm
Home club or Range: BDS, L&BRC
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: .260 Remington C.O.A.L

#15 Post by jcampbellsmith »

HALODIN wrote:This is my understanding and I fully accept I could be wrong... I thought the values published in reloading manuals were `generally` accepted for most rifles, whilst of course there may be the odd exception. I was advised to test a non primed round in the chamber before reloading the rest of the brass. If the bolt either doesn't or is difficult to close then there's a problem. The variance I believe is down to the headspace of the chamber. To add to this, you can improve on accuracy by adjusting the COAL so the difference between the ogive and the lands (the jump) is optimal for your rifle/bullet etc... There are of course tolerances that mustn't be ignored. Is that correct?
The Gun Pimp wrote:Your COAL should bear some resemblance to YOUR rifle surely. My COAL may not work in your chamber. You need to measure your own COAL - various devices are available for this purpose.
I would be looking for COAL of 2.750 in one of my 260's and 2.900 in the other. Each has been chambered to a specific COAL. Regards JCS
HALODIN

Re: .260 Remington C.O.A.L

#16 Post by HALODIN »

This is the best I've achieved so far. No I'm not including the first shot and yes I should probably work as a government statistician... :grin:

Hornady curved OAL gauge en-route and then we'll see what difference it makes.

Image
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests