Ammunition for wildlife - Airfield use ?
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.
Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.
Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Ammunition for wildlife - Airfield use ?
Hi all,
I have been asked to provide vermin control at an Airfield, I do use shotguns there at present and although they do fine for birds and small creatures, for foxes and the odd deer I intend to use rifles. I have a .22 and .223 which I feel would suffice for the wildlife I will encounter, but before I add this new permission to my ticket I am looking for ammo advice.
Can some of you wildlife controlers out there point me in the right direction?, abviously with multi million dollar Aircraft around I will need my rounds to hit their target and stay there, to ensure no through and through rounds go anywhere they shouldn't.
I have never used expanding ammo so forgive the ignorance in advance.
I have been asked to provide vermin control at an Airfield, I do use shotguns there at present and although they do fine for birds and small creatures, for foxes and the odd deer I intend to use rifles. I have a .22 and .223 which I feel would suffice for the wildlife I will encounter, but before I add this new permission to my ticket I am looking for ammo advice.
Can some of you wildlife controlers out there point me in the right direction?, abviously with multi million dollar Aircraft around I will need my rounds to hit their target and stay there, to ensure no through and through rounds go anywhere they shouldn't.
I have never used expanding ammo so forgive the ignorance in advance.
Re: Ammunition for wildlife - Airfield use ?
Barnes Varmint Grenade
It's also under question if the bullets are S.5 - as the legal definition for S5 uses the phrase "controlled expansion" or something similar.
No "controlled expansion" to be seen, given the very frangible nature of the Varmint Grenade
It's also under question if the bullets are S.5 - as the legal definition for S5 uses the phrase "controlled expansion" or something similar.
No "controlled expansion" to be seen, given the very frangible nature of the Varmint Grenade
Re: Ammunition for wildlife - Airfield use ?
.22 might not be enough for humane kill on a fox. Otherwise, normal expanding ammunition and apply the usual rules as to safe backstop etc in case of a through shot/miss
Re: Ammunition for wildlife - Airfield use ?
Thanks, yep thats why I thought my 223 would come in, that Barnes ammo also seems to drop vermin instantly with no through shot.Dombo63 wrote:.22 might not be enough for humane kill on a fox. Otherwise, normal expanding ammunition and apply the usual rules as to safe backstop etc in case of a through shot/miss
Re: Ammunition for wildlife - Airfield use ?
sconie wrote:Dombo63 wrote:...that Barnes ammo also seems to drop vermin instantly with no through shot.
clapclap
- Sandgroper
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 4735
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
- Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
- Contact:
Re: Ammunition for wildlife - Airfield use ?
Has anyone confirmed the status of the VG bullet as S5 or S1?saddler wrote:Barnes Varmint Grenade
It's also under question if the bullets are S.5 - as the legal definition for S5 uses the phrase "controlled expansion" or something similar.
No "controlled expansion" to be seen, given the very frangible nature of the Varmint Grenade
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”
Lieutenant General David Morrison
I plink, therefore I shoot.
Lieutenant General David Morrison
I plink, therefore I shoot.
- kennyc
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:21 pm
- Home club or Range: hunters NRPC
- Location: Reading West Berks
- Contact:
Re: Ammunition for wildlife - Airfield use ?
without knowing where you are, the first thing that jumps to mind is that the .223 is only legal for the smaller deer species (and Roe in Scotland) and that varmint type bullets are not generally suitable for deer, through and through shots are a fact of life, thats why we are so fixated on a safe backstop for every shot! have you got expanding on your FAC?sconie wrote:Hi all,
I have been asked to provide vermin control at an Airfield, I do use shotguns there at present and although they do fine for birds and small creatures, for foxes and the odd deer I intend to use rifles. I have a .22 and .223 which I feel would suffice for the wildlife I will encounter, but before I add this new permission to my ticket I am looking for ammo advice.
Can some of you wildlife controlers out there point me in the right direction?, abviously with multi million dollar Aircraft around I will need my rounds to hit their target and stay there, to ensure no through and through rounds go anywhere they shouldn't.
I have never used expanding ammo so forgive the ignorance in advance.
Re: Ammunition for wildlife - Airfield use ?
I should imagine suitably placed high seats (or control tower!) wouldn't be a bad idea either.
Re: Ammunition for wildlife - Airfield use ?
I have spoken to the licencing office and I will have to add expanding ammo, as tickets are up for renewal they told me to add the details on my submission. I am in the central belt and the only deer we see are Roe so .223 should suffice.
There is one area with backstop but the majority of the field is flat and open as Airfields should be, as we are careful to keep a low profile with all the plane spotters around the field, a high chair would not be popular and would create an obstruction to aircraft.
Not the easiest of locals to shoot over with stealth, accuracy and controlled penitration required.
Thanks for all the replies.
There is one area with backstop but the majority of the field is flat and open as Airfields should be, as we are careful to keep a low profile with all the plane spotters around the field, a high chair would not be popular and would create an obstruction to aircraft.
Not the easiest of locals to shoot over with stealth, accuracy and controlled penitration required.
Thanks for all the replies.
- kennyc
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:21 pm
- Home club or Range: hunters NRPC
- Location: Reading West Berks
- Contact:
Re: Ammunition for wildlife - Airfield use ?
~I thought flatness of area would be a problem, however if you are thinking of using a centerfire rifle, or even a .22LR for that matter, then you are going to have to come to terms with backstops, no matter what ammo you use, some of it is likely to go off on its own to check out the local views every now and again! the only safe way to shoot on a flat area like that is to get some altitude on your side, are there any hangers/buildings with fire escape platforms that would act as high seats? plane spotters are also going to be a real headache for you, as they will turn up in the most awkward circumstances and oddest places! possibly sticking to shotguns may be your best bet for general use, and save the rifles for specific areas where you can get a safe backstop . (plane spotters bless them , are not generally considered a safe backstop )sconie wrote:I have spoken to the licencing office and I will have to add expanding ammo, as tickets are up for renewal they told me to add the details on my submission. I am in the central belt and the only deer we see are Roe so .223 should suffice.
There is one area with backstop but the majority of the field is flat and open as Airfields should be, as we are careful to keep a low profile with all the plane spotters around the field, a high chair would not be popular and would create an obstruction to aircraft.
Not the easiest of locals to shoot over with stealth, accuracy and controlled penitration required.
Thanks for all the replies.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests