Patents and rights to design ARs

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
JS569

Patents and rights to design ARs

#1 Post by JS569 »

I had a thought on the commute home this evening, we have all these independent guys building AR's often from scratch (Eg Lantac or Bradley arms). Are there not patents and ownership of the AR design? Admittedly the straight pull versions are different to the original design but what about the Sec5 variants or the all the rifles produced in the US to that design. I'm pretty sure the same can be said for AK variants with all the producers around the world.

So my question is could you produce an under-lever such as a Winchester or a Marlin in the same fashion as the AR builders? Or would your design have to be significantly different to effectively become your own design? Just a thought and I wondered what others thought of the possibilities.
User avatar
meles meles
Posts: 6335
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: Patents and rights to design ARs

#2 Post by meles meles »

Patents expire, in the UK usually after 25 years.
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
John MH

Re: Patents and rights to design ARs

#3 Post by John MH »

Most stuff is a tweaked copy of someone else innovation, very little is original. The advantage of the AR platform is it's modular and each iteration is sometimes an improvement on what was there before although a lot of the improvements actually serve no practical purpose other than to look or feel 'tacticool'.
JS569

Re: Patents and rights to design ARs

#4 Post by JS569 »

Fundamentally the AR platform isn't that different from the original design, any changes have been incremental over time and small changes, it's never had an overhaul mechanically that has significantly altered the rifle
User avatar
snayperskaya
Posts: 7234
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 6:43 pm
Home club or Range: West Bank of the Volga.....
Location: West of The Urals
Contact:

Re: Patents and rights to design ARs

#5 Post by snayperskaya »

Not sure on ARs but only a handful of countries produced AKs actually under licence.Countries like Bulgaria,China,Poland,East Germany and Romania immediately spring to mind and possibly India and Pakistan .The majority of countries produced there own copies without a license, they are even built from scratch in the Khyber Pass region of Afghanistan/Pakistan.Then you've got all the ones in the States built on new US made receivers using readily available parts kits (usually a complete AK minus the receiver,and often interesting stuff like old PLO AKMs etc).If I remember correctly the only country with a license from Izhmash (now called Kalashnikov Concern) to produce the Ak-100 series domestically is Venezuela
"The only real power comes out of a long rifle." - Joseph Stalin

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank.....give a man a bank and he can rob the world!.

More than a vested interest in 7.62x54r!
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7847
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Patents and rights to design ARs

#6 Post by Blackstuff »

JS569 wrote:Fundamentally the AR platform isn't that different from the original design, any changes have been incremental over time and small changes, it's never had an overhaul mechanically that has significantly altered the rifle
Going from direct impingement to a gas ram system in most of the newer models is pretty significant for the platform IMO but obviously nothing 'new' to firearms overall.
DVC
User avatar
Charlotte the flyer
Posts: 1155
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 11:02 am
Home club or Range: Classified
Location: Staffs
Contact:

Re: Patents and rights to design ARs

#7 Post by Charlotte the flyer »

Armalite originally sold the rights to Colt in the 50's. I'm sure I've read somewhere that the US Govt now have it and that they issue it to builders. I could be wrong though.
The above post probably contains sarcasm or some other form of attempted wit, please don't take it to heart.
JS569

Re: Patents and rights to design ARs

#8 Post by JS569 »

Blackstuff wrote:
JS569 wrote:Fundamentally the AR platform isn't that different from the original design, any changes have been incremental over time and small changes, it's never had an overhaul mechanically that has significantly altered the rifle
Going from direct impingement to a gas ram system in most of the newer models is pretty significant for the platform IMO but obviously nothing 'new' to firearms overall.
Is the gas ram just a piston system? Plenty of DI's are still been made and sold, correct me if I'm wrong the military M4 is DI too
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7847
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Patents and rights to design ARs

#9 Post by Blackstuff »

JS569 wrote:
Blackstuff wrote:
JS569 wrote:Fundamentally the AR platform isn't that different from the original design, any changes have been incremental over time and small changes, it's never had an overhaul mechanically that has significantly altered the rifle
Going from direct impingement to a gas ram system in most of the newer models is pretty significant for the platform IMO but obviously nothing 'new' to firearms overall.
Is the gas ram just a piston system? Plenty of DI's are still been made and sold, correct me if I'm wrong the military M4 is DI too
They're the same old models with DI though, i'm talking about the H&K 416 etc Most are either piston/gas ram only, or at least offer it as an option. Much better imo #don'tsh*twhereyoueat :good:
DVC
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10752
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Patents and rights to design ARs

#10 Post by Sim G »

As you said Mark, there's nothing new. The concept of piston driven AR's, the mating of Stoner's rotary locking bolt with a short stroke gas piston, was done in the late 60's early 70's. Remember the AR180/18, known then as the "poor man's M16"? Well that's exactly what it was, a piston driven AR. Even our very much maligned SA80 is a variation on that theme....
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests