PPU Brass vs Lapua brass

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
User avatar
ovenpaa
Posts: 24689
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: PPU Brass vs Lapua brass

#11 Post by ovenpaa »

I would agree, internal volume is going to have an impact. As an example, a #2156 built to 2.900" with a given load of TR140 behind it through a 30" barrel:

Case capacity 55 grains water gives 2966fps
Case capacity 56 grains water (Default) gives 2942fps
Case capacity 5y grains water gives 2919 fps
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
Mr_Logic

Re: PPU Brass vs Lapua brass

#12 Post by Mr_Logic »

I have shot both at long range. With the right sorting and prep, PPU is OK. However, Lapua is more consistent and stronger, so it is a much better choice.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests