dromia wrote:There were mass murders before the invention of firearms and there will be mass murders if firearms are taken away.
Burke and Hare
Sawney Bean
Just two examples that were at the top of my head.
Moderator: dromia
dromia wrote:There were mass murders before the invention of firearms and there will be mass murders if firearms are taken away.
I have held a firearms licence for at least 25 years so yes I may be a bit out of touch with how long it takes to acquire one if you are a new shooter straight of the street.Alpha1, FAC in 7-9 months is about the minimum. 6 months to become a full cub member, then however long it takes to issue. How long have you been shooting, haven't learned the rules yet? ;-)
Nothing will convince the ants, apart from no firearms in civilian hands.Whatever convinces the antis would work for me, they're the ones that need to be appeased
Sim G wrote:So you'd support a total ban on everything? That's what GCN believe is required to prevent another mass shooting and even if it saves just one life, it would be worth it. So that's a stance you could take?
Firstly, there is nothing any government can do to prevent another mass shooting. They can limit the possibility/probability, but they will never prevent it.
Secondly, there is no half way with firearms legislation. We've tried all of the negotiation and appeasement and gave still had two gun bans. Some of us never want that again and w know softly softly will not save us, we gave to meet it head on forcibly.
ordnance wrote:If that is the case no amount of psychiatric tests will stop it. From all accounts Ted Bundy was a charming intelligent nice individual, and would have no problem passing a psychiatric test. We know how that ended. As I have already said people can tell psychiatric doctors what they want to hear, there is no blood test for psychiatric illness. You really need to think things through before posting.
There are already things in place to try and prevent firearms ( legally getting ) into the hands of people unfit to hold a licence. You need referees. You have a criminal background check . The police can check your medical records. there is no perfect system. And as I have said peoples mental state can change from day to day, how do you monitor that. ?I didn't say any of that, in fact what I've suggested may prevent it. What would you change to keep firearms out of the hands of those who are unfit to hold a licence?
What makes someone at a club qualified to monitor any ones mental health.Perhaps there's more to monitoring rifle club member's mental well being than I realise and perhaps that's enough
People go to the doctor with mental health problems looking help. Someone looking a firearm would not admit mental health problems . Do you see the difference. ?By extension of your logic, there's no point in anyone having a psychiatric test for anything because they're easily fudged. I don't think that's true, otherwise no one would ever be diagnosed mentally ill.
christel wrote:Dromia, do you have a link to firearms uk?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests