RFD charges....

Had a good experience with a gun shop or rifle maker? Found a good deal? Tell us about it. Had a bad experience, TELL THE GUN SHOP!

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Posting of negative comments in the Gunshop section could bring unwanted criticism on the forum, having said that it is important to let members know if dealings with a Gunshop were less than ideal for you. To that end we will allow what will be known as the 'Scotsgun Ruling'

The Scotsgun Ruling:

>Add Gun Shop here<

"As I've yet to have a 'positive' experience there, I'll refrain from commenting further."

Beyond that please take it up with the Gunshop, if you do resolve the issue in a agreeable manner let us know!

This rule applies to the entire forum.
Message
Author
stottycake
Past Supporter
Posts: 283
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:10 pm
Home club or Range: Tcsc,.gardners guns,
Contact:

Re: RFD charges....

#11 Post by stottycake »

[quote="Blackstuff"]I use two RFDs which are <700metres apart (as the crow flies), one charges £10 to receive a gun, the other £35 (last time I checked which was over 3 years ago).

Now the more expensive one is a proper gun shop with multiple staff members and the other is a one-man-band in an industrial unit so they obviously have differing costs to cover, but come on. The paperwork is barely more taxing that than what the certificate holder has to send to the police.

£15-20 is the max i'll pay, even if i had to drive further (which fortunately I don't) and incurr similar overall cost, i'd do it out of principle.[/quote

I know who you mean,
Lever357
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 1:10 pm
Home club or Range: Louisa Centre
Location: Newcastle UponTyne
Contact:

Re: RFD charges....

#12 Post by Lever357 »

stottycake wrote:
Blackstuff wrote:I use two RFDs which are <700metres apart (as the crow flies), one charges £10 to receive a gun, the other £35 (last time I checked which was over 3 years ago).

Now the more expensive one is a proper gun shop with multiple staff members and the other is a one-man-band in an industrial unit so they obviously have differing costs to cover, but come on. The paperwork is barely more taxing that than what the certificate holder has to send to the police.

£15-20 is the max i'll pay, even if i had to drive further (which fortunately I don't) and incurr similar overall cost, i'd do it out of principle.[/quote

I know who you mean,
Ha ha, me too!!!
Remember, we're all here because we're not all there!
User avatar
snayperskaya
Past Supporter
Posts: 7234
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 6:43 pm
Home club or Range: West Bank of the Volga.....
Location: West of The Urals
Contact:

Re: RFD charges....

#13 Post by snayperskaya »

The most I have paid is £40 for a transfer, my RFD has never charged me to receive a rifle.
"The only real power comes out of a long rifle." - Joseph Stalin

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank.....give a man a bank and he can rob the world!.

More than a vested interest in 7.62x54r!
PeterN
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2020 8:08 am
Contact:

Re: RFD charges....

#14 Post by PeterN »

The last two rifles I bought, the dealers did not add on any extra for postage and just charged the advertised price. The receiving RFD is a part time dealer and a member of a club I am in and he didn't charge to receive them.
Regards
Peter.
User avatar
Sim G
Past Supporter
Posts: 10726
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: RFD charges....

#15 Post by Sim G »

The few examples illustrate perfectly my point. I do believe that it has killed a section of the trade. Cheap guns are no longer cheap when fees at both ends are added. This to my mind is also very short sighted by dealers. Certain classes of firearms deemed obsolete, such as vintage gallery rifles, will end up scrapped.

Postal services all over the world reciprocate deliveries from overseas, that’s the agreement of that union. Is it not time, given the disparity of charges and the desperate shot in the arm the gun trade could do with, that such as the GTA not negotiate a standard amongst their members that reflects the need to use dealers, coupled with fair fees and a decent deal for the customer?
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
User avatar
Ovenpaa
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 24680
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: RFD charges....

#16 Post by Ovenpaa »

I do have a bit of a favourite within the trade who charges us GBP8.00 to ship and has been known to throw another gun in for the Viking free of charge. :)

This is how the trade used to be and I sometimes think the old school deals like this are what makes it enjoyable for me.
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
User avatar
Blackstuff
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 7709
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: RFD charges....

#17 Post by Blackstuff »

Sim G wrote:The few examples illustrate perfectly my point. I do believe that it has killed a section of the trade. Cheap guns are no longer cheap when fees at both ends are added. This to my mind is also very short sighted by dealers. Certain classes of firearms deemed obsolete, such as vintage gallery rifles, will end up scrapped.

Postal services all over the world reciprocate deliveries from overseas, that’s the agreement of that union. Is it not time, given the disparity of charges and the desperate shot in the arm the gun trade could do with, that such as the GTA not negotiate a standard amongst their members that reflects the need to use dealers, coupled with fair fees and a decent deal for the customer?
Could a potential problem of a 'standard' fee, especially if applied nationally and getting London disproportionately high fees skewing a national average, that it would inevitably lead to the increase in fees charged by smaller/one-man-band outfits and potentially risk them from getting the business? Enforcing a maximum 'cap' could be a way to go though to stop some RFDs taking the Michael.
DVC
User avatar
Mattnall
Site Supporter Since 2016
Posts: 2858
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:32 pm
Home club or Range: Harlow TAC, NRA, BSRC
Contact:

Re: RFD charges....

#18 Post by Mattnall »

Sim G wrote:Is it not time, ..., that such as the GTA not negotiate a standard amongst their members ..?
So you want to force a business to charge what you want, a 'standard fee'?
Just so you can have the convenience of using the shop you want, to receive the items you want at a price you want to pay.

You can do that by asking the charges first, then if you don't like them move on. The dealer will either keep charging the fees and lose your custom or lower his fees and enjoy your company as you occasionally you buy a cheap gun, possibly partly subsidised by the dealer.

A RFD owner will charge what they want for what they provide, if the customer doesn't like it then the customer can go somewhere else. There is not a monopoly in this business, far from it, and a standard fee doesn't take in to account the different overheads every business has.
Arming the Country, one gun at a time.

Good deals with Paul101, Charlotte the flyer, majordisorder, Charlie Muggins, among others. Thanks everybody.
User avatar
Pippin89
Posts: 1009
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 11:54 am
Home club or Range: Chichester Rifle and Pistol Club
Location: West Sussex, UK
Contact:

Re: RFD charges....

#19 Post by Pippin89 »

Sim G wrote:But all along these fees have to be considered when buying a gun. A little bargain is sometimes not that good a bargain.
You're not wrong there. I bought a £100 bargain at Holts Auction last year. By the time I got it home with the auction fees, Holts shipping fees and my receiving RFD fees it more or less doubled the sales price. Luckily it was still cheap for what it was.
User avatar
JS569
Posts: 477
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:47 pm
Home club or Range: catterick

Re: RFD charges....

#20 Post by JS569 »

Fee charging is a tricky thing. I run a service based business, nothing to do with firearms, and we have a constant debate internally about how we should charge. Essentially we're selling our time and expertise.

Sometimes the things clients ask of us require little skill, it's a churn job. This we apply a cost based on the time it takes. I'm certain you could find our service cheaper from a freelancer and likewise more expensive if you went to a bigger company. Our charges take into account the cost of the person delivering the work, the office, electricity and so forth, all to ensure we have enough left in it to make some money at the end of the day.

The question we often ask ourselves is what is it worth to the client...which in many cases the hourly rate doesn't cover so the client is getting good value. The hard thing is when a client queries a cost of X hours to do something that on the face of it is quite simple but actually takes the time invoiced, if not longer. I suspect RFDs absorb a lot of time costs that we never see, everyone values their time and service differently, being a free market we can shop around.

Interestingly we're seeing a lot of clients working with us as they want to work with a smaller supplier and they're open about this. I suspect it's partly because we'll be far cheaper but also because they can form a relationship with us rather than a bigger corporate supplier.

Sorry if this wavered off topic, it drew some interesting parallels with my day to day work.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests