Home Office Firearms Consultation

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
Christel
Site Admin
Posts: 17376
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:52 pm
Location: Wind Swept Denmark
Contact:

Home Office Firearms Consultation

#1 Post by Christel »

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultat ... rms-safety

Always worth filling these surveys in :good:
markS
Past Supporter
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 5:26 pm
Home club or Range: Grove small arms
Location: North Norfolk
Contact:

Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation

#2 Post by markS »

BASC have provided some suggestions on responding: https://basc.org.uk/firearms-safety-consultation/
User avatar
Blackstuff
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 7719
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation

#3 Post by Blackstuff »

Looks like BASC have completely missed the potential for mission creep on 14 and 15 (the proposed handloading restriction), not even a mention of handloaders in the example list of people that should be exempt?! 5mith

I'm not a member any more so it would be helpful if anyone who is can pull them up on it. I'm still going to email them though.
DVC
The Gun Pimp
Posts: 1154
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation

#4 Post by The Gun Pimp »

It says - To what extent do you consider that the possession of component parts of ammunition with intent to manufacture unauthorised quantities of complete rounds of ammunition should be made an offence?

That's - with intent to manufacture UNAUTHORISED

Surely we - as FAC holders are AUTHORISED to manufacture ammunition? I read it as referring to a non-FAC holder.
User avatar
Ovenpaa
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 24680
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation

#5 Post by Ovenpaa »

I agree Vince.
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
User avatar
Blackstuff
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 7719
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation

#6 Post by Blackstuff »

The Gun Pimp wrote:It says - To what extent do you consider that the possession of component parts of ammunition with intent to manufacture unauthorised quantities of complete rounds of ammunition should be made an offence?

That's - with intent to manufacture UNAUTHORISED

Surely we - as FAC holders are AUTHORISED to manufacture ammunition? I read it as referring to a non-FAC holder.
Just playing Devils advocate but why mention 'unauthorised quantities' when criminals/non-cert holders can't manufacture ANY authorised amount?

Surely the offence should be something like 'Possession of component parts of ammunition with intent to manufacture complete rounds of ammunition by an unauthorised person' leaves no doubt/wiggle room for 'mission creep'?
DVC
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 19991
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation

#7 Post by dromia »

Is not manufacturing unauthorised quantities of ammunition already an offence therefore intent is part of that?

Fortunately I am no lawyer and as the law is already an ass I could well be wrong.
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 19991
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation

#8 Post by dromia »

I don't know how difficult it is to prove "intent" but it would be daft to make possession of parts an offence when the crux is that it is an offence to actually assemble those parts into live ammunition if not already authorised.

So if it was a illegal to possess cases say, then an FAC holder who once had a certain calibre on his FAC and made ammunition for it and misplaced a case for that calibre when he got rid of the firearm for that calibre and no longer had authorisation then having that case would make him a criminal.

It would also effect inert ammunition collections as most of them are assembled from parts sans live primer and powder.
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
The Gun Pimp
Posts: 1154
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation

#9 Post by The Gun Pimp »

I suppose if the police suspect someone (without an FAC) is making ammo for criminals and they search his premises and find the components - but no assembled ammo - they can prosecute - if this becomes law.
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 19991
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation

#10 Post by dromia »

No doubt but that is without the wider context of legal gun and ammunition ownership and collateral effect 'twould have on the law abiding firearms owner and collector.
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 7 guests