Hornady M beam scales problem.

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
User avatar
Alpha1
Site Supporter Since 2020
Posts: 8556
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Hornady M beam scales problem.

#11 Post by Alpha1 »

The scales are working fine now I have got the correct pan on each scale. But as I said its made me doubt my powder charges so I'm dismantling two at each charge weight and re-weighing them. In the future, I will just use one scale and not mix the pans up. I tend to use the one you calibrated with my targetmaster trickler.
User avatar
Geek
Site Supporter Since 2020
Posts: 1379
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:04 am
Home club or Range: Diggle Range and Rossendale Fusiliers
Location: North West
Contact:

Re: Hornady M beam scales problem.

#12 Post by Geek »

Alpha1 wrote:I all ways refer to the manufactures data when using a new powder or working with a new caliber. I have only just acquired my copy of quick load so I'm still checking it out.
For example, I'm using 139g Scenars with N150 using Vitavouri load data. I'm reading a lot to see what other people are up to on the other forums etc. There is a lot of info out there from Laurie for instance.
I am loading for a 6.5CM and using 139g Scenars, but using N160. According to the Vihtavuori load data, minimum is 33grs and the maximum is 42.1grs https://www.vihtavuori.com/reloading-da ... rtridge=95. Been to the range and using my MagnetoSpeed Chromograph (Sporter) I obtained the following:

41.5 - 2616 / 2612 / 2616 = 2614 ft/s
41.0 - 2536 / 2596/ 2592 = 2574 ft/s
40.5 - ave 2554 ft/s
40.4 - ave 2543 ft/s
40.3 - ave2548 ft/s
40.2 - ave 2532 ft/s
40.1 - ave 2537 ft/s

The most accurate was 41.5grs
Regards,

Geek


AI AT (.308/6.5CM), Ruger PR (6.5CM), American Rimfire (.22LR), Remington 700 (.223), Marlin underlever .38/.357/.44, Savage 6BR, RimfireMagic .22LR, Fabarm Lion (s1), Fabarm Axis Baikal S/S
User avatar
Alpha1
Site Supporter Since 2020
Posts: 8556
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Hornady M beam scales problem.

#13 Post by Alpha1 »

Geek wrote:
Alpha1 wrote:I all ways refer to the manufactures data when using a new powder or working with a new caliber. I have only just acquired my copy of quick load so I'm still checking it out.
For example, I'm using 139g Scenars with N150 using Vitavouri load data. I'm reading a lot to see what other people are up to on the other forums etc. There is a lot of info out there from Laurie for instance.
I am loading for a 6.5CM and using 139g Scenars, but using N160. According to the Vihtavuori load data, minimum is 33grs and the maximum is 42.1grs https://www.vihtavuori.com/reloading-da ... rtridge=95. Been to the range and using my MagnetoSpeed Chromograph (Sporter) I obtained the following:

41.5 - 2616 / 2612 / 2616 = 2614 ft/s
41.0 - 2536 / 2596/ 2592 = 2574 ft/s
40.5 - ave 2554 ft/s
40.4 - ave 2543 ft/s
40.3 - ave2548 ft/s
40.2 - ave 2532 ft/s
40.1 - ave 2537 ft/s

The most accurate was 41.5grs
Thanks for the input I have a tub of N160. Are you using small or large primer brass.
User avatar
Geek
Site Supporter Since 2020
Posts: 1379
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:04 am
Home club or Range: Diggle Range and Rossendale Fusiliers
Location: North West
Contact:

Re: Hornady M beam scales problem.

#14 Post by Geek »

I am using Hornady brass with large primers.

However, I do have Lapua small primer brass, but I have not yet used those.

I was advised if using 139's use N160, however, if using 123s then N150.
Regards,

Geek


AI AT (.308/6.5CM), Ruger PR (6.5CM), American Rimfire (.22LR), Remington 700 (.223), Marlin underlever .38/.357/.44, Savage 6BR, RimfireMagic .22LR, Fabarm Lion (s1), Fabarm Axis Baikal S/S
User avatar
phaedra1106
Past Supporter
Posts: 3390
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Just outside Sacriston (the nice bit!)
Contact:

Re: Hornady M beam scales problem.

#15 Post by phaedra1106 »

The Viht data isn't quite right, it's the same load figures they published for the large primer case, they then changed the description to small primer case but made no adjustment to the actual data.

Read through Lauries excellent articles (and other sources) and you'll see the small primer cases tend to need more powder to achieve the quoted velocities.

In my case I'm using Starline SRP brass (normal size flash holes in those) and N150, I need at least 0.3gr to .8gr over the given load data to get similar speeds.

Currently running Nosler 140gr Custom Competitions over 36gr of N150, I have a few thousand of the Scenar 139s to try so will see what they do at that load next outing (2 weeks time).
There's room for all Gods creatures, next to the mash and gravy :)
User avatar
Alpha1
Site Supporter Since 2020
Posts: 8556
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Hornady M beam scales problem.

#16 Post by Alpha1 »

So were are you getting these thousands of 139g scenars Jeff.
User avatar
phaedra1106
Past Supporter
Posts: 3390
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Just outside Sacriston (the nice bit!)
Contact:

Re: Hornady M beam scales problem.

#17 Post by phaedra1106 »

Same place as usual, Germany and Luxembourg, got a shipment of 6,000 Lapua Scenar 139gr 6.5's and 155gr .30's along with a couple of thousand Hornady A-Max 155gr .30's

Stocks of my usual Nosler Custom Competition have gone up in price by around 20-30% and down in availability, the newer Nosler RDF's are like hens teeth to find!.

I have another shipment of the Lapua and Hornady due in the next week or so.
There's room for all Gods creatures, next to the mash and gravy :)
User avatar
phaedra1106
Past Supporter
Posts: 3390
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Just outside Sacriston (the nice bit!)
Contact:

Re: Hornady M beam scales problem.

#18 Post by phaedra1106 »

Just heard from my supplier, the 139gr Scenars are out of stock but more are expected later this week.
There's room for all Gods creatures, next to the mash and gravy :)
Daryll
Past Supporter
Posts: 1047
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 9:07 am
Home club or Range: Isle Target Sports Club
Location: Cambridgeshire
Contact:

Re: Hornady M beam scales problem.

#19 Post by Daryll »

gashtyke wrote:Beam scale pans are normally weighted ( i.e. calibrated to the beam) . They are NOT for use on electronic scales.

Nor are they transferable between beams.
I would have thought that any pan can be used on any balance, as long as you tare (set to zero) the balance with the pan before you start weighing...?
1066
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 2161
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Hornady M beam scales problem.

#20 Post by 1066 »

Daryll wrote:
gashtyke wrote:Beam scale pans are normally weighted ( i.e. calibrated to the beam) . They are NOT for use on electronic scales.

Nor are they transferable between beams.
I would have thought that any pan can be used on any balance, as long as you tare (set to zero) the balance with the pan before you start weighing...?
True - as long as they are fairly close to start with (with a beam scale). But you can't zero with one then swap to another half way through without a re-zero unless they are exactly the same weight.
TARGETMASTER
an altogether better trickler
www.targetmasteruk.com
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests